Monday, June 27, 2016

INCIDENT ON 18 JUNE 2016 / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA = PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION

VIDEO RECORDING / 18 JUNE 2016 @
http://likroper.com/18JUNE2016.mp4

*This voice recording does not require the knowledge and/or consent of the Oasis Nightclub; as there are no legal protections for the commission of criminal and/or civil infractions -- doing so would amount to an obstruction of justice. Those who violate the rights of others; forfeit their own rights. > go to: http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-632.html

On June 18th, 2016 John walked into the Oasis Nightclub in Sunnyvale, California; sat down and filled out a karaoke slip and gave it to KJ Joe; who was there that night. The bartender then called out to Joe from across the room saying: "the guy in the red hat has to leave" (in other words; John) and this unlawful order was given by Oasis Nightclub owner Jerry Grimes. 

But if a nightclub does not charge an entry fee; then it goes without saying that anybody and everybody of legal age can enter without financial obligation and/or discrimination. This has always been the unspoken law of rock n roll; and remains the unspoken law of the land.

After experiencing this same kind of thing in the past; John was ready this time with his ACLU app and secretly recorded his conversation with Jerry. Regardless of California state law requiring a business code-based reason for ejection from any private business of public accommodation; Jerry said John had to leave "because I said so..." which is not a lawful excuse to eject someone from a nightclub. (It is also technically unlawful to secretly record someone in the state of California; but sometimes one must take chances and make exceptions to expose the truth and/or bring about justice; and especially when so many roadblocks have been created to stop the pursuit of this justice -- and besides; the NSA and/or federal government has been covertly monitoring all of us over the last few years anyway; so what's the difference?) Regardless; the approach Jerry took may be acceptable for a Father scolding his children; but not in this case. Not sure whether the ACLU app worked properly; before exiting the premises John doubled up by recording a conversation with the bartender who Jerry gave the unlawful ejection order to begin with. (GO TO: http://likroper.com/18JUNE2016.mp4 + https://www.mobilejusticeca.org/)

JERRY GRIMES

GO TO: BOYCOTT THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE CALIFORNIA @ https://www.facebook.com/BoycottTheOasisNightclubSunnyvale/?ref=bookmarks + THE RIGHT TO REFUSE SERVICE; CAN A BUSINESS REFUSE SERVICE TO SOMEONE? @ https://www.legalzoom.com/articles/the-right-to-refuse-service-can-a-business-refuse-service-to-someone-because-of-appearance

John then called the Sunnyvale D.P.S. non-emergency line as usual; telling them about the illegal ejection from the Oasis and/or the "O" (which would not necessarily have happened if Officers Smith and Ochoa had just done their jobs to begin with); ending with one Officer unsuccessfully attempting to intimidate John before ending the conversation.

FURTHERMORE; JUST IN CASE JOHN WAS ILLEGALLY EJECTED FROM THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB AS SOME SORT OF STUPID KNEE JERK REACTION TO THE RECENT INCIDENT IN FLORIDA -- "The real truth of the story was released to a former Los Angeles County prosecutor who works for Get Off the BS by two Santa Monica police officers that have been issued gag orders under threat of Federal prosecution for talking further talking about the incident. 

According to two department sources, Howell called the Santa Monica police on Sunday morning claiming that he needed protection from the CIA. Howell further elaborated to the dispatcher stating that he “had been set up by the CIA – they are going to kill me.” According to Howell, he was in LA to meet with another person in a collaborated attack on the gay communities in both Florida and Los Angeles. Howell additionally stated that, “everything has gone south. Dan was gone when I got here. They killed the leader of the Florida attack this morning. They are going to kill me. I need protection...” > GO TO: http://getoffthebs.com/five-suspects-involved-in-planned-attacks/

STATEMENT FROM JOHN: "I never schmoozed Jerry while at the O like many other people did; I just went there to sing karaoke; so that could have something to do with the way he is treating me. I always found Jerry to be a bit unfriendly and abrasive so I avoided talking to him or making direct eye contact most of the time unless it was absolutely unavoidable. 

But I did carry around an Oasis Nightclub magnet on my delivery van for a year or two which brought in countless people over time; making Jerry money in the process. Some of which would leave after dealing with KJ Doug Ward though. 

OASIS NIGHTCLUB 
MAGNET ADVERTISEMENT
And while MANY others ultimately left the Oasis due to Dougs' rudeness; I was able to deal with it until Doug finally cracked at one point and got violent while I was on the phone with his Avent's Empty Band Karaoke boss asking why I suddenly wasn't being allowed to sing for the first time in 15 or so years at the O. That's right; the supposed church-going man who owns the Avent's karaoke company heard me being attacked over the phone but failed to fire Doug on the spot. I then called Sunnyvale DPS who promised to pull up the footage; but negligent responding officers Ochoa and Smith for some reason refused to pull up the surveillance footage from the O; then gave me unlawful orders to leave -- violating my civil rights in the process.

Doug Wards' attack was a misdemeanor assault which did not cause injury. Regardless; when unnecessary roughness occurs in a football game; the ball is moved ten yards back. What is the legal equivalent of moving the ball ten yards back? Adding to this; if the same attack happened to a female club patron; the surveillance footage would likely have been pulled up; and an arrest would have been made -- adding a strong selective enforcement and/or gender bias aspect to this case; because when a female allegedly gets her buttocks groped -- there is a city-wide man hunt -- but when a man allegedly gets attacked in a similar non-injurious manner; police usually make no arrest. But when law enforcement gets attacked in a similar manner; it is an automatic felony. 

Is it fair for those who are sworn to protect and serve people to be treated better than those who they are sworn to protect and serve?

NOTE: THAT'S CALLED "PUTTING THE CART BEFORE THE HORSE" --
WE ARE THE HORSE; GOVERNMENT AND/OR POLICE ETC ARE THE CART...
For instance; officer involved shootings are wrong for various reasons. First off; shooting someone more often than not denies them of their life -- and therefore their liberty and pursuit of happiness. Adding to this; it is also a form of cruel and unusual punishment with no due process where the officer involved in the shooting often acts as the judge; jury and executioner all at once -- then gets a vacation for it. And the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection under law; even though police officers are generally protected more than those they are sworn to protect and serve. This is called "putting the cart before the horse"; when we are the horse and they are the cart...

GO TO: The Fourteenth Amendment @ 

The "Jim Morrison being kicked out of the Whisky A Go-Go" aspect of this is probably the only real good side to all of this; as boring milquetoast singers rarely get ejected from bars. So if this puts me in the Jim Morrison category; that's a good thing. Regardless; Jim Morrison and The Doors had their First Amendment rights violated when they were ejected from the Whisky that night. And I don't care what the judge says...The Doors got their rights violated...but! The Doors would never have gone on to do all of the amazing things they did during the post-Whiskey era without this illegal ejection -- just as I did by eventually going to Woodhams lounge; Blinkys Can't Say (and having the same rights violations occur at both clubs); then finally a pinnacle moment singing with the live karaoke band at the Rockbar Theatre in San Jose. 

A band that actually considered forming a cover band with me for a time. And while that cover band never happened; for this reason it is a good thing. But justice still needs to be done despite all the 'good' that came out of my initial O ejection... 

The Rockbar Theater had a HUGE stage; a really cool sound man who sometimes worked at SAP Center; extensive lighting and a light man; the best karaoke host in the south bay with Davey K; smoke machines; a VIP section full of hot chicks who would occasionally get up and dance on good nights; a tight live band; etc etc etc. It took awhile for me to come down off that Rockbar high; and when I finally went to sing at the O once again after a few months it was extremely anticlimactic; with KJ Doug perilously in control of my microphones' volume knob once again; sabotaging my performance by cutting back the volume (I once toured big arenas with a national act playing drums years back; and the sound man was my best buddy on tour and still is a good friend [he last worked for Seal; and has worked for everyone from The Manhattan Transfer to Ratt to Joe Perry Project to George Lynch etc etc etc] the headlining act forced us to cut the master volume to 50% at all times to sabotage our performance and make the headlining band sound better; so I know all about volume knob sabotage).

In retrospect; at least I had one good night of karaoke the week before being illegally ejected once again; hanging out with old friends that I had been separated from by KJ Doug and/or the initial unlawful orders given by Officers Ochoa and Smith...

The most troubling thing about all of this is that from cops to club owners; no one knows or even seems to care what California law states regarding this issue. And I have also therefore learned some hard lessons about inhumanity in the process too; as many people seem to care less about freedom and/or civil rights and/or the rule of law and/or pretty much anything other than themselves (there are psychopathic people all around us).

How could I have been a patron at the Oasis Nightclub for roughly 15 years without incident; brought in countless people by helping the bar advertise; sung my heart out for many die hard fans; bought a beer and gave a big tip to ex-bartender Stephanie every week without fail; and been one of the most popular karaoke singers at the O -- and still end up being illegally ejected from this private business establishment of public accommodation which is supposed to give a code based reason for ejection? It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever..."

GO TO: LIK ROPER'S  BANDCAMP.COM WEB SITE

NOTE: The most outstanding event that occurred at the Oasis Nightclub over time was Johns' interaction with an alleged CIA agent (who will remain anonymous). John was initially approached by this supposed CIA agent regarding the police misconduct John was experiencing at the time; saying (Officer) "Paolinetti is a crooked cop" (also adding that Officer Paolinetti had been reprimanded countless times) and "they have it out for you" (in other words; the Sunnyvale Police) "otherwise they would not have stormed your house" (when Sunnyvale D.P.S. had tons of prior knowledge of Johns' valiant litter gathering activities). This individual also praised Johns' independent scientific research; stating that federal government physicists etc are already aware of many of the weather-related aspects of LRE RESEARCH

This same person was then allegedly retaliated against by being fired from his position for helping John (the first government employee that cared enough to help John in over a decade) and later supposedly went to work for the F.D.A. working with medical marijuana.

<><><>

"Further proof of John's obvious mental health and/or extreme intelligence is contained within John's independent scientific research. John could have graduated early from High School; but chose instead to drop out of school to play the drums. Years later after the death of his brother Carl; John got interested in science once again and started researching various subjects.

Extremely intelligent (and/or especially extremely emotionally intelligent) people like John are often seen by relative simpletons as being freaks and/or "mentally ill" due to their incredible intelligence and/or sheer volume of thought and expression. But let's face it; many people are of average intelligence and not worthy of the genius label; while John clearly is a genius in his own right.

And especially when it comes to emotional intelligence; where it almost seems like John was born with all of the available emotional intelligence in the universe -- while many others somehow got NONE WHATSOEVER.  (George Hills Incorporated; Judge Louis Amadeo Junior; federal X-officer Gabrielle Seagrave and/or Santa Clara officer Pablo Lopez etc etc etc).

John was even praised for his absolutely brilliant independent scientific research by an alleged C.I.A. agent who added to Johns' research base with even more important information previously unknown to John. So please! Stop the character assassination and get with the program already! High school is over now kiddies; so let's stop the bullying! Bullying starts at the federal government level; then slowly trickles down to everyone else.
.."

 GO TO: LRE RESEARCH @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/01/lre-research.html + http://likroper.com > click on the LRE RESEARCH button...

<><><>

SEE ALSO: INSTITUTIONALIZED REVERSE RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (continued) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/02/1-black-singer-attacked-in-east-bay.html + OASIS NIGHTCLUB KARAOKE HOST DOUG WARD FLEES TO NEVADA : AN ADMISSION OF GUILT? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/03/oasis-nightclub-karaoke-host-doug-ward.html + OFFICERS SMITH AND OCHOA @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/11/posdps-officers-smith-and-ochoa-illegal.html + CATLYN HOLLYWOOD ASSAULTED? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/04/catlyn-hollywood-assaulted.html + REST IN PEACE MISTER DOUG @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/rest-in-peace-mister-doug.html + WOODHAMS LOUNGE BARTENDER RETALIATION @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/woodhams-bartender-retaliation.html + LEMONS TO LEMONADE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/07/lemons-to-lemonade.html + THE MYSTERY MAN FROM LOCKHEED (MML) AND FORCED MASS VACCINATIONS @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-mystery-man-from-lockheed-mml-and.html + LEGALIZED DISCRIMINATION IN CALIFORNIA? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/11/legalized-discrimination-in-california.html + BLACK WOMEN'S BOOK CLUB WINS $11 MILLION DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT AGAINST TRAIN COMPANY FOR 'LAUGHING TOO LOUDLY' @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/04/black-womens-book-club-wins-11-million.html

 "I called Jerry at the Oasis. He told me because of fighting and other reasons that he would not tell me. If you want to call him, I will give you the bars phone number. I support you. I could only do so much. Please talk to him and get the info from him. He only told me so much. He told me "Because I said so"..." -- Anonymous

SEE ALSO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

OASIS NIGHTCLUB BARTENDER ANGIE: John called the Sunnyvale police from his cell phone on 20 April 2012 between 8 and 9 pm PDT. Oasis Nightclub bartender Angie can be heard dissuading John on this recorded call from Johns' cell phone. The female Officer who took the call also clearly heard Oasis Nightclub bartender Angie dissuading a witness by telling John to leave the Oasis Nightclub in retaliation for John calling the Sunnyvale police; and this same Officer even commented upon it during the call. Question: Why was no action taken regarding this event? > GO TO: 18 USC § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant @ http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/PEN/3/1/7/6/s136.1

 NOTE: The State of California has facilitated this blatant discrimination with their largely unregulated law allowing people to be denied service in private businesses of public accommodation. "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone" appears at face value to be a simple law; but there are many conditions attached to this often abused law.

UPDATE / 5 JULY 2017: Since the June 2016 incident at the Oasis Nightclub; much has transpired. Not only have thousands of illegal immigrants who once called California home been deported; but a travel ban that did not exist in June 2016 has now been established by the Trump administration. The discrimination John experienced at the Oasis Nightclub was only the tip of the iceberg that was about to be exposed. All the civil rights laws and/or lessons of the 1960s inspired by everything from the inhumane actions of WWII Nazis -- to the rampant discrimination experienced by African Americans etc -- have seemingly been forgotten. The bottom line: Life is not a reality show and no one needs to go home tonight.

Thursday, June 9, 2016

INCIDENT ON 8 JUNE 2016 / GANG ACTIVITY; CONSPIRACY; NON-COINCIDENTAL CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL HARASSMENT AND/OR STALKING; DISTURBING THE PEACE; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; WITNESS INTIMIDATION ETC

REBHOLTZ HARASSMENT VEHICLE
On 8 June 2016 at around 10:57 PM a continuation of the non-coincidental harassment John has experienced over the last decade occurred once again. This time it appears to be the Rebholtz's youngest child who -- along with his Mother -- not only falsely accused John of harassing the Rebholtz family  (something the Rebholtz kids and their various friends have obviously done for almost a decade now; without recourse) but they also obstructed justice among many other things in the process. The Rebholtz kid (whose lives at 1147 Dune Court in Sunnyvale) was caught in the act of his stalking and harassment etc on video on 8 June 2016 (see vehicle above and/or video link below). A vehicle was heard driving up then idling outside Johns' residence; after which the driver of the vehicle "floored" the gas pedal and sped down Thunderbird Avenue at high speed. 

Between 10:45 PM and 10:48 PM gang activity can be seen occurring outside of Johns' residence (see: swinging nunchucks and/or "nanchuku"; stealing fuit etc) and there appears to be at very least one female who appears to be part of this gang as well. These "Rebholtz gang" members (if you will) then returned to Dune Court and the Rebholtz residence at 1147 Dune Court thereafter.

REBHOLTZ FAMILIA VEHICLES
THE TRUCK SEEN ON THE RIGHT BELONGING TO THE YOUNGEST REBHOLTZ CHILD WAS PARKED ON THUNDERBIRD AVENUE BY JOHNS' RESIDENCE UNTIL THIS MORNING WHEN IT WAS MOVED TO THIS LOCATION -- VEHICLE SEEN IN THE DRIVEWAY TO THE RIGHT OF THE STREETLIGHT WAS THE VEHICLE USED FOR THIS NON-COINCIDENTAL UN-CIVIL HARASSMENT
 
SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY
SUSPICIOUS GANG-RELATED LOITERING ACTIVITY OUTSIDE JOHNS' RESIDENCE 8 JUNE 2016 @ 10:46:01 PM -- ONE INDIVIDUAL APPEARS TO BE SWINGING NUNCHUCKS AND/OR A 'NUNCHAKU' WEAPON -- SINCE THEY ARE RICH WHITE KIDS CONNECTED TO A CROOKED SANTA CLARA COP; THE LOCAL POLICE HAVE SO FAR REFUSED TO INTERVENE

REBHOLTZ GANG MEMBERS EXITING
"REBHOLTZ GANG" MEMBERS VEHICLE SEEN LEAVING DUNE COURT 
AND THE REBHOLTZ RESIDENCE @ 10:49 PM

EVIDENCE OF PREMEDITATION
THE REBHOLTZ VEHICLE CAN BE SEEN IDLING FOR ALMOST ONE MINUTE JUST OUT OF RANGE OF SURVEILLANCE BEFORE ACCELERATING TO A HIGH RATE OF SPEED (SEE PHOTOS ABOVE AND BELOW) PROVING PREMEDITATION WAS INVOLVED IN THIS PARTICULAR INCIDENT

REBHOLTZ VEHICLE
SEE VIDEO LINK BELOW
SEE: SURVEILLANCE VIDEO FOOTAGE

What Is Civil Harassment? In general, civil harassment is abuse, threats of abuse, stalking, sexual assault, or serious harassment by someone you have not dated and do NOT have a close relationship with, like a neighbor, a roommate, or a friend (that you have never dated). It is also civil harassment if the abuse is from a family member that is not included in the list under domestic violence. So, for example, if the abuse is from an uncle or aunt, a niece or nephew, or a cousin, it is considered civil harassment and NOT domestic violence.

The civil harassment laws say “harassment” is: Unlawful violence, like assault or battery or stalking, OR A credible (real) threat of violence, AND The violence or threats seriously scare, annoy, or harass someone and there is no valid reason for it.


Criminal Harassment versus Civil Harassment: Criminal harassment should not be confused with how "harassment" is often used in contexts such as workplace discrimination lawsuits. Federal and state laws ban discrimination against certain types of people in certain situations, such as at work or in housing decisions. In these non-criminal contexts, the victim can sue the harasser in a private civil lawsuit, alleging that the harassment constitutes discrimination.

On the other hand, criminal harassment is usually confined to state law. States vary in how they define criminal harassment. Generally, criminal harassment entails intentionally targeting someone else with behavior that is meant to alarm, annoy, torment or terrorize them. Not all petty annoyances constitute harassment. Instead, most state laws require that the behavior cause a credible threat to the person's safety or their family's safety. GO TO: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/harassment.html

RELATED STORIES: WHO IS JIDE NOWAK? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/who-is-jide-nowak.html + STATE LAW CROSSWALK SIGN NEEDED ON DUNFORD WAY @ THUNDERBIRD AVENUE IN SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/07/state-law-crosswalk-sign-needed-on.html + FLORA VISTA AVENUE IN SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/05/flora-vista-avenue-in-santa-clara.html + NEW TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES NEEDED NOW! @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/11/new-traffic-calming-measures-needed-now.html

VARIOUS QUESTIONABLE COVER UPS BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND/OR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE AND/OR SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENTS @ ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/07/various-criminal-andor-illegal-cover.html + INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/incident-on-15-december-2013.html + STALKING BY REBHOLTZS' DAUGHTER @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/stalking-by-rebholtzs-daughter.html + INCIDENT ON 11 JULY 2010 @ 2:20 AM @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/08/incident-on-11-july-2010-220-am.html + SEE ALSO: BIGGERTHANSNOWDEN.COM @ http://www.biggerthansnowden.com/

10 JUNE 2016: INSULTING ALGORITHMIC LAMESTREAM MEDIA 'FAKE NEWS' REVERSE PSY-OPS SURVEILLANCE-BASED NEW YORK TIMES/NSA RESPONSE / @ https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/11/health/gang-stalking-targeted-individuals.html?_r=0

NOTE: THE SUNNYVALE DPS AND/OR THESCCDAS' OFFICE MUST NOW WORK TO EXPEDITIOUSLY EXTRACT THEIR SEVERE CRANIAL/POSTERIOR SYNDROME(S) AND FINALLY ADMIT FAULT AND/OR GRANT PERMANENT EXPUNGEMENT (OTHER THAN CIA AND/OR NSA RECORD) REGARDING THE JUNE 2011 INCIDENT INVOLVING THE PAOLINETTI/REBHOLTZ FAMILIA CONSPIRACY.

SEE ALSO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ 
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

Tuesday, June 7, 2016

VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER ETC (CONTINUED) 5

8 NOV 2011 @ 7:24 AM

VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER | 8 nov 2011 -- John had his voting rights violated by the Sunnyvale police department when he was ordered to stay off the Peterson middle school property on a day when John wanted to vote (see above). Note: John has not voted since this day due to this questionable rights violation and is now due financial reparations for this and various other rights violations.

VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 / SEC. 11. (a) No person acting under color of law shall fail or refuse to permit any person to vote who is entitled to vote under any provision of this Act or is otherwise qualified to vote, or willfully fail or refuse to tabulate, count, and report such person's vote. (b) No person, whether acting under color of law or otherwise, shall intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for voting or attempting to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for urging or aiding any person to vote or attempt to vote, or intimidate, threaten, or coerce any person for exercising any powers or duties under section 3(a), 6,8,9,10, or 12 (e). > go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

SEE ALSO: VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/09/violation-of-voting-rights-act-of-1965.html + SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PRESIDING JUDGE ROSE JONES PICHON @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/santa-clara-county-superior-court.html

NOTE: Five days away from the New York primary, independent voters protested the state's closed primary process, which they say will exclude nearly 3 million residents from voting on April 19 — a particularly damaging prospect for non-establishment candidates. Dozens of demonstrators, who support Sanders, recently gathered on the steps of New York's City Hall, calling on lawmakers to open up New York's primary election process, which would allow any registered voter regardless of their political affiliation to vote for the candidate of their choice. (Republicans are not the only ones who rig the voting system [like what happened in Florida during the year 2000 election > see: UNPRECEDENTED video below] because Democrats can be just as sleazy as Republicans).
 
RELATED STORIES: INDEPENDENT VOTERS ARE PISSED THEY CAN'T VOTE FOR TRUMP OR SANDERS IN NEW YORK @ https://news.vice.com/article/independent-voters-are-pissed-they-cant-vote-for-trump-or-sanders-in-new-york + SEE ALSO: WHEN INDEPENDENTS CAN VOTE; BERNIE SANDERS WINS @ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brian-hanley/when-independents-can-vot_b_9834224.htmlUNPRECEDENTED @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQ7j7Gv-s5

NOT ONLY DID JOHN DISTRIBUTE ROUGHLY 10,000+ FLYERS THAT BROUGHT THE FULL CIRCLE FARM IN SUNNYVALE TO HIS OLD HIGH SCHOOL; BUT JOHN IS ALSO SEEN AS A HERO OF SORTS TO MANY WITHIN HIS NEIGHBORHOOD -- THE FACT IS; LOCAL POLICE IN CLOWN SUITS WITH GUNS ARE CLEARLY MORE DANGEROUS THAN ANYONE IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD FOR NEGLECTING TO PREVENT ABUSES AGAINST JOHN OVER NEARLY A DECADE OF TIME; ALONG WITH THE FBI ETC ETC ETC -- THE BOTTOM LINE: ANYONE WHO CAN SHOOT YOU AND GET A VACATION IS FAR MORE DANGEROUS THAN ANY OUTSPOKEN DUCK FEEDING/LITTER GATHERER...

Monday, June 6, 2016

SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PRESIDING JUDGE ROSE JONES PICHON

THE HONORABLE RISE JONES PICHON
“It’s given me the courage at this point of my life to make sure people are treated fairly. I can’t say it’s best to treat everyone the same because that’s no longer true. Justice is not blind.” - GO TO: https://magazine.scu.edu/article.cfm?c=22607 

NOTE: Presiding Judge Rise Jones Pichon of the Santa Clara County Superior Court (who seems like a very intelligent and nice lady -- but let's face it; even intelligent, nice ladies can say stupid things that come back to bite them in the butt) is required by law under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution to treat all people equally regardless of difference.

John filed an Amended Complaint with the Superior Court of California, Sunnyvale Courthouse in August 2015; and Judge Pichon became the presiding Judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court in January 2016 -- therefore John will re-file this complaint once again so it goes before Judge Pichon for perhaps different results that fall within the boundaries of law.  
<><><>

The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction "the equal protection of the laws". > GO TO: EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause + EQUAL PROTECTION: AN OVERVIEW @ https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/equal_protection 

Similarly; in United States federal anti-discrimination law, a protected class is a characteristic of a person which cannot be targeted for discrimination. The following characteristics are considered "Protected Classes" by Federal law: Race – Civil Rights Act of 1964. > GO TO: PROTECTED CLASS @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_class  

(Note: Caucasians are now a minority in the State of California)

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964) is a landmark piece of civil rights legislation in the United States[5] that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.[6] It ended unequal application of voter registration requirements and racial segregation in schools, at the workplace and by facilities that served the general public (known as "public accommodations").

Powers given to enforce the act were initially weak, but were supplemented during later years. Congress asserted its authority to legislate under several different parts of the United States Constitution, principally its power to regulate interstate commerce under Article One (section 8), its duty to guarantee all citizens equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment and its duty to protect voting rights under the Fifteenth Amendment. The Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964, at the White House. 

"An act to enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States of America to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes..." (Enacted by the 88th United States Congress). > GO TO: CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

NOTE: Also; after receiving a complaint, the defendant must respond with an answer. (Note: The Superior Court of California -- the Sunnyvale Courthouse and the Santa Clara Courthouse -- failed to respond to an Amended Complaint submitted by John in September 2015 -- the Santa Clara Courthouse had a good excuse while the Sunnyvale Courthouse clearly DID NOT). 

This is nothing more than just a big extension of the cover up that has been going on for nearly a decade now; it's UNACCEPTABLE AND WILL NOT BE TOLERATED IN A CIVILIZED SOCIETY! Adding to this; when John fails to vote once again in November 2016 (due to the color of law being used to keep him off a property where John has to vote) there will be yet ANOTHER incident to file with the City of Sunnyvale. So please stop trying to slither out of this and face the truth once and for all so John can finally get on with his life.

GO TO: THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE AND/OR THE FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 AND/OR THE FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/05/the-equal-protection-clause-andor.html + AFTER RECEIVING A COMPLAINT; THE DEFENDANT MUST RESPOND WITH AN ANSWER? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/05/after-receiving-complaint-defendant.html + DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/04/demand-for-case-remand.html + A STRONGLY WORDED LETTER @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/04/to-whom-it-may-concern.html + HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/03/houston-we-have-problem.html + THANKS FOR NOTHING / PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html + VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER (CONTINUED)http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/09/violation-of-voting-rights-act-of-1965.html

EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW is dedicated to promoting a society in which all human beings can flourish by ensuring that the legal system protects the important principles of human and civil rights, equality, and fairness.  They fight the inequalities that continue to permeate both our legal system and our society as a whole. 

Although the words “Equal Justice Under Law” are etched into the façade of white marble above the United States Supreme Court, too often our legal system falls woefully short of its lofty goals, especially for people living in poverty.  Our modern legal system is characterized by violations of basic human and civil rights on a massive scale.  Many of these violations have become such regular features of everyday life and legal practice that they are barely noticed.  The result is the subtle economic and cultural normalization of abuses that should shock us to the core. > GO TO: EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW @  http://equaljusticeunderlaw.org/