Wednesday, May 31, 2017

U.S. TRAVEL BAN VERSUS THE NO FLY LIST

Since Donald Trumps' travel ban was blocked in court; then why is the U.S. no-fly list containing thousands of innocent American citizens still in effect? And why is no one talking about this? Perhaps because the U.S. no-fly list has more to do with controlling peoples' movements (protestors etc) than anything terrorism-related? 


QUESTION: Why is the Judiciary more interested and/or concerned with the rights of immigrants than United States citizens -- when two wrongs constitute a violation of rights?
What about deferential universality and/or universal deference? 

RELATED STORIES: CANADA GEESE @ THE MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS IN SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/03/canada-geese-marina-playa-apartments-in_31.html + UNALIENABLE RIGHTS @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/unalienable-rights.html + THE U.S.A. BULLSHIT ACT @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-usa-bullshit-act.html

At some point the United States government will have to finally admit some fault in this matter. There is way too much at stake to do otherwise. In the case of the 9/11 incident and the follow up investigation; there are too many lies to count -- with no official affirmative action taken to correct these various discrepancies as of yet. The American people have been fed a false 9/11 dialogue that needs drastic revision. There is not only way too much exculpatory evidence to continue ignoring; but also way too many rights that stand to be wrongfully violated in the future from this egregious, overarching multifarious conduct. Someone has to finally; forcefully break down this wall of silence and speak the truth -- once and literally FOR ALL. For instance; in a court case dealing with law enforcement -- one single lie can upend an entire case and causing mistrial, false verdict or appeal. 

GO TO: 9-11 Conspiracy Solved Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!

It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition @
http://anonhq.com/european-scientific-journal-concludes-911-was-a-controlled-demolition/

Families of 9/11 Victims On Verge of Proving Government Cover Up in Court @ 

9/11 - Loose Change: Final Cut FULL VERSION @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE9LTYHiknE


At least part of the problem with the U.S. no-fly list is population-based; in that numerous people became expeditiously semi-criminalized lacking due process (using secret evidence unavailable to the accused) therein creating a logistical nightmare of sorts for all affected; mainly the judiciary. 

Therefore some new system of due process needs to be created to deal with this formidable population-based judicial quandary. Perhaps some form of court-based online submission/exoneration due process system for the affected. Suspects need to increasingly own and/or control their own data so they can more effectively defend themselves in court.

The bottom line: most of the rights violations and/or police misconduct etc that John experienced happened during this post-911 era of overarching multifarious corruption and deceit.

18 U.S. CODE § 1001 - STATEMENTS OR ENTRIES GENERALLY (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully — (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years. > GO TO: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

NOTE: After touring with a rock band many years back; John flew so much that he swore he would never fly again -- and John has by choice not flown since. So this no-fly list does not necessarily affect John -- but there are countless others who it does affect and/or who need to have this legally required due process to clear their good names. > SEE ALSO: The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution each contain a due process clause. Due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the Government outside the sanction of law. > Go To: Due Process Clause - Wikipedia @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause

NOTE: Shortly after September 11, 2001 the FBI admitted to actively actively destabilizing activists for 25 years prior to the 9-11 attacks (and especially black activists); and the USA Patriot Act later turned this dirty little secret into law. (source: ACLU) 

"The USA Patriot act did more harm to Americans than help them, they've used the 9/11 event to abuse our rights and invade our privacy and claim it's for our safety..." -- Anonymous