The June 2011 incident involving the "Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia" in Sunnyvale, California was severely mischaracterized not only by Sunnyvale DPS; but also Judge Socrates Manoukian of the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara who apparently did not see the obvious fact that John was the person in fact being harassed and stalked; not the Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia. John's residence had been under an extended siege for a number of years by the Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia conspiracy (etc) long before the June 2011 incident ever occurred
GO TO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv
3. Defendants their co-conspirators have for many years sought to deceive about the health effects of their harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing campaign. Defendants have also repeatedly and consistently denied involvement in the harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing of Plaintiff, while evidentiary material gathered by Plaintiff strongly suggests otherwise. Even though Defendants have long understood not only the illegality involved in such behavior, but also the hazards caused by harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing.
Defendants could have developed new strategies to counter this illegal behavior, but defendants chose and conspired not to do so. Defendants have repeatedly and consistently stated that they are sworn to protecting the public in a fair and equal fashion, while using questionable law enforcement techniques that clearly do not protect the public equally.
4. In all relevant respects, defendants acted in concert with each other in order to further their fraudulent scheme. Beginning not later than 2007, defendants, their various agents and employees, and their co-conspirators, formed an "enterprise" ("the Enterprise") as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4). That Enterprise has functioned as an organized association-in-fact for almost 10 years to achieve, through illegal means, the shared goals avoiding the consequences of their actions. (Sunnyvale D.P.S.; George Hills, Inc etc – Obstruction of Justice etc etc etc)
4. In all relevant respects, defendants acted in concert with each other in order to further their fraudulent scheme. Beginning not later than 2007, defendants, their various agents and employees, and their co-conspirators, formed an "enterprise" ("the Enterprise") as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4). That Enterprise has functioned as an organized association-in-fact for almost 10 years to achieve, through illegal means, the shared goals avoiding the consequences of their actions. (Sunnyvale D.P.S.; George Hills, Inc etc – Obstruction of Justice etc etc etc)
Each defendant has knowingly and/or perhaps unknowingly participated in the operation and management of the Enterprise, and has committed numerous acts to maintain and expand the Enterprise.
5. In order to avoid discovery of their fraudulent conduct and the possibility that they might be called to account for their conduct, defendants engaged in a widespread scheme to frustrate public scrutiny by making false and deceptive statements and by concealing documents etc that they knew would have exposed their public campaign of deceit. This scheme included making false and deceptive statements to the public etc.
6. Defendants' tortious and unlawful course of conduct has caused plaintiff to suffer dangerous diseases and injuries. As a consequence of defendants' tortious and unlawful conduct, plaintiff has depleted all life insurance monies left to plaintiff by plaintiffs’ deceased brother. The effect of defendants' fraudulent scheme and wrongful conduct continues to this day; as defendants are continuing their unlawful and tortious conduct; and, unless restrained by this Court, defendants are likely to continue their unlawful activities into the future. GO TO: http://likroper.com/CITYOFSUNNYVALE4.wpd and/or http://likroper.com/CITYOFSANTACLARA4.wpd
5. In order to avoid discovery of their fraudulent conduct and the possibility that they might be called to account for their conduct, defendants engaged in a widespread scheme to frustrate public scrutiny by making false and deceptive statements and by concealing documents etc that they knew would have exposed their public campaign of deceit. This scheme included making false and deceptive statements to the public etc.
6. Defendants' tortious and unlawful course of conduct has caused plaintiff to suffer dangerous diseases and injuries. As a consequence of defendants' tortious and unlawful conduct, plaintiff has depleted all life insurance monies left to plaintiff by plaintiffs’ deceased brother. The effect of defendants' fraudulent scheme and wrongful conduct continues to this day; as defendants are continuing their unlawful and tortious conduct; and, unless restrained by this Court, defendants are likely to continue their unlawful activities into the future. GO TO: http://likroper.com/CITYOFSUNNYVALE4.wpd and/or http://likroper.com/CITYOFSANTACLARA4.wpd
Adding to this; Sunnyvale DPS actually held a police briefing in March 2011 regarding the egregious multi-year stalking and harassment campaign John was experiencing without taking any affirmative action to stop the violations and abuse at the time. The only action Sunnyvale DPS took was Officer Odle (who is a really nice guy and a good cop) citing a Rebholtz gang member for having a vehicle that was not street legal; and/or having You Tube videos containing important evidence removed and/or destroyed in a futile attempt to protect their reputation as part of the illegal "enterprise" Johns' illegally ignored Amended Complaint addresses.
GO TO: AFTER RECEIVING A COMPLAINT; THE DEFENDANT MUST RESPOND WITH AN ANSWER? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/05/after-receiving-complaint-defendant.html
JUNE 2011: After many years of trying to get Sunnyvale D.P.S. to stop the harassment and stalking and menacing and finally giving up at some point;
John tried once again in June of 2011. After seeing friends of the
Rebholtz brothers suspiciously hanging around outside Johns' window once
again; John did what he had planned to do for many months. John went
outside with a video camera to record and witness the situation so if
anything happened later that night (as it had many times in the past;
originating from the Rebholtz residence); John would present the
evidence to Sunnyvale D.P.S. John ended up being backed up about
30 feet by Jake Paolinetti (intimidation and/or coercion = injury
and/or civil rights violation); then surrounded by a group of Jakes'
friends including one of the Rebholtz brothers. John then pushed back
Jake Paolinetti with his right elbow; fell to the ground to protect his
camera from damage -- and
ended up getting a large gash on his forearm. Jake said he needed
'medical attention' when he did not. John was the only one who needed
medical attention but refused it. The next day Jake left comments on
Johns' You Tube site claiming Jake never needed any medical attention.
MALICIOUS NON-PROSECUTION? Lieutenant Simpsons' slanderous suggestion that John is somehow mentally unstable after 5 years of extended stalking and harassment was an obvious abuse of power. This clearly caused harm to John’s reputation and therefore amounting to injury; and was part of the said "enterprise" designed to save their police etc reputations from harm. And even if John was mentally unstable [which John clearly is not] as Lieutenant Simpson suggested; discriminating against those with disabilities -- even if those disabilities are clearly imagined -- is against the law. Lieutenant Simpson was aware of http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY as far back as March 2011 when a Sunnyvale DPS morning police briefing took place regarding the You Tube channel and the disturbances etc John was experiencing at the time. Officer Odle responded; but did not take enough affirmative action to completely stop the harassment etc emanating from the Rebholtz Familia compound.
NOTE: Jake Paolinetti is clearly NOT entitled to the qualified immunity available to government officials; as the legal principle to bar Jakes' illegal and threatening conduct is clearly pre-established -- Also; no court has ever recognized a First Amendment right for ANY citizen to be free from retaliatory non-arrest with probable cause; nor was such a right otherwise clearly established at the time of Jakes' non-arrest -- And while it has been pre-established that government officials may not be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution; the question remains whether government officials CAN be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory non-prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution.
John suggested on You Tube in March 2011 that Jake Paolinetti was perhaps mentally ill due to his odd, unpredictable and dangerous behavior; and Lietentant Simpson was fully aware of this claim due to the police briefing that took place regarding the http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY web site as far back as March 2011. John feels this bogus mental illness claim was nothing more than a form of GASLIGHTING and/or reverse psychological operations designed to blame John for the harassment he was experiencing and therefore cover it up and make it all "go away".
APRIL 2011: Jake Paolinetti and friends drive by John's house one afternoon menacing, stalking and harassing John at his residence (non-coincidentally); doing exactly what they did for a number of years at night. Jake can be heard yelling "You motherfucking faggot" etc while John is clearly heterosexual. Jake then returned to Johns' residence later that night banging on the side of Johns' house; causing John to go outside and record Jake while waiting for Sunnyvale DPS to respond. The responding Sunnyvale DPS officer refused to review the footage and therefore took to action once again; letting Jake and his little brother (see: conspiracy) escape without arrest once again. Note: It is not only illegal to cover up the harassment and/or menacing of people if the menacing behavior is conspiratorial and/or non-coincidental -- but it is also illegal to harass and threaten people based upon their suspected sexual preference. The bottom line: it's highly illegal for ANYONE to stalk ANYONE ELSE regardless of their various stupid reasons for doing so.
MAY 2007: An incident occurred where John (and his elderly father) were woken up at around 1:56 A.M. in the morning by the individuals seen is this link. (Go to: http://likroper.com/IMG_0528.gif) The individuals in question rang Johns' doorbell; then verbally harassed John and his elderly Father before attacking John outside Johns' house right before Sunnyvale D.P.S. Officers arrived. The suspects in question attempted to flee the scene; but were stopped at the intersection of Dunford Way and Teal Drive by Sunnyvale D.P.S. One of the Officers was a 'Minority'; while the other was Caucasian (while Caucasians are now a Minority in the State of California). The 'Minority" Officer had obvious malicious intent; as the 'Minority' Officer not only displayed obvious angry facial micro-expressions towards John; but the Caucasian Officer also gave John a scared look like he had no idea why the 'Minority' Officer was acting the way he was. Both suspects were then let go; free to continue harassing John for many months afterwards.
APRIL 2006: The Sunnyvale Police Department had numerous chances to apprehend Johns' various stalkers and attackers; but every time Sunnyvale D.P.S. failed to take the suspects into custody even though this kind of conspiratorial stalking is clearly a felony in the State of California (see also: civil harassment). An individual named Tom Foley was laying in wait for John while John was feeding ducks at the Lake Terrace Apartments. A few months earlier; John had encountered Tom Foley waiting in the bathroom to confront John at the old Acapulco Restaurant on Lawrence Expressway in Santa Clara; and John recently realized that this angry bathroom encounter with Tom Foley was likely inspired by the photo seen in the "TOM FOLEY @ THE LAKE TERRACE APARTMENTS: LAYING IN WAIT + CONSPIRACY ETC" blog post (see link below); showing John in the Acapulco restaurant bathroom taking a "selfie" way before "selfies" were popular. Tom Foley was at the Acapulco Restaurant conspiring against John with several people from the Lake Terrace Apartments.
But! our supposedly advanced society was supposed to have already learned a HUGE lesson about preserving important historical information when the Aztec and Inca civilizations had their monuments and historical documentation destroyed by early Spanish Christians who thought the Aztec and Inca were evil; as the Spanish colonization of the Americas largely destroyed the Aztec and Inca civilizations. So why is this kind of thing still occurring?
SEE
ALSO: JAKE PAOLINETTI: CRIMINAL THREATS; TARGETED STALKING; HATE
CRIMES; GANG ENHANCEMENTS; ETC @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdSSSANDXlE + JAKE PAOLINETTI: CONSPIRACY AND HATE CRIMES @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/jake-paolinetti-conspiracy-and-hate.html + THANKS FOR NOTHING @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/thanks-for-nothing.html + THANKS FOR NOTHING / PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html
NOTE: Jake Paolinetti is clearly NOT entitled to the qualified immunity available to government officials; as the legal principle to bar Jakes' illegal and threatening conduct is clearly pre-established -- Also; no court has ever recognized a First Amendment right for ANY citizen to be free from retaliatory non-arrest with probable cause; nor was such a right otherwise clearly established at the time of Jakes' non-arrest -- And while it has been pre-established that government officials may not be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution; the question remains whether government officials CAN be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory non-prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution.
John suggested on You Tube in March 2011 that Jake Paolinetti was perhaps mentally ill due to his odd, unpredictable and dangerous behavior; and Lietentant Simpson was fully aware of this claim due to the police briefing that took place regarding the http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY web site as far back as March 2011. John feels this bogus mental illness claim was nothing more than a form of GASLIGHTING and/or reverse psychological operations designed to blame John for the harassment he was experiencing and therefore cover it up and make it all "go away".
GO TO: LRE RESEARCH @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/01/lre-research.html
APRIL 2011: Jake Paolinetti and friends drive by John's house one afternoon menacing, stalking and harassing John at his residence (non-coincidentally); doing exactly what they did for a number of years at night. Jake can be heard yelling "You motherfucking faggot" etc while John is clearly heterosexual. Jake then returned to Johns' residence later that night banging on the side of Johns' house; causing John to go outside and record Jake while waiting for Sunnyvale DPS to respond. The responding Sunnyvale DPS officer refused to review the footage and therefore took to action once again; letting Jake and his little brother (see: conspiracy) escape without arrest once again. Note: It is not only illegal to cover up the harassment and/or menacing of people if the menacing behavior is conspiratorial and/or non-coincidental -- but it is also illegal to harass and threaten people based upon their suspected sexual preference. The bottom line: it's highly illegal for ANYONE to stalk ANYONE ELSE regardless of their various stupid reasons for doing so.
DELETED VIDEO: MENTAL ILLNESS | HATE CRIMES | CRIMINAL THREATS | STALKING | HARASSMENT ETC @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZuOygtSY6A (see: Evidence Tampering + Obstruction of Justice etc) + REPLACED VIDEO @ http://likroper.com/P1000593.MOV + SEE ALSO: April 2011: JAKE PAOLINETTI: CONSPIRACY AND HATE CRIMES @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/jake-paolinetti-conspiracy-and-hate.html
MAY 2007: An incident occurred where John (and his elderly father) were woken up at around 1:56 A.M. in the morning by the individuals seen is this link. (Go to: http://likroper.com/IMG_0528.gif) The individuals in question rang Johns' doorbell; then verbally harassed John and his elderly Father before attacking John outside Johns' house right before Sunnyvale D.P.S. Officers arrived. The suspects in question attempted to flee the scene; but were stopped at the intersection of Dunford Way and Teal Drive by Sunnyvale D.P.S. One of the Officers was a 'Minority'; while the other was Caucasian (while Caucasians are now a Minority in the State of California). The 'Minority" Officer had obvious malicious intent; as the 'Minority' Officer not only displayed obvious angry facial micro-expressions towards John; but the Caucasian Officer also gave John a scared look like he had no idea why the 'Minority' Officer was acting the way he was. Both suspects were then let go; free to continue harassing John for many months afterwards.
APRIL 2006: The Sunnyvale Police Department had numerous chances to apprehend Johns' various stalkers and attackers; but every time Sunnyvale D.P.S. failed to take the suspects into custody even though this kind of conspiratorial stalking is clearly a felony in the State of California (see also: civil harassment). An individual named Tom Foley was laying in wait for John while John was feeding ducks at the Lake Terrace Apartments. A few months earlier; John had encountered Tom Foley waiting in the bathroom to confront John at the old Acapulco Restaurant on Lawrence Expressway in Santa Clara; and John recently realized that this angry bathroom encounter with Tom Foley was likely inspired by the photo seen in the "TOM FOLEY @ THE LAKE TERRACE APARTMENTS: LAYING IN WAIT + CONSPIRACY ETC" blog post (see link below); showing John in the Acapulco restaurant bathroom taking a "selfie" way before "selfies" were popular. Tom Foley was at the Acapulco Restaurant conspiring against John with several people from the Lake Terrace Apartments.
GO TO: TOM FOLEY @ THE LAKE TERRACE APARTMENTS: LAYING IN WAIT + CONSPIRACY ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/06/tom-foley-laying-in-wait-conspiracy-etc.html + http://likroper.com/THEBACKDOOR.html + SEE ALSO: http://likroper.com/CRAZYTOM.wmv + http://likroper.com/CRAZYTOM2.wmv + http://likroper.com/CRAZYTOM4.wmv + http://likroper.com/exhibit-E.gif
SEE ALSO: APPLICABLE FEDERAL STATUTES @
But! our supposedly advanced society was supposed to have already learned a HUGE lesson about preserving important historical information when the Aztec and Inca civilizations had their monuments and historical documentation destroyed by early Spanish Christians who thought the Aztec and Inca were evil; as the Spanish colonization of the Americas largely destroyed the Aztec and Inca civilizations. So why is this kind of thing still occurring?
GO TO: GO TO: YOUTUBE.COM: PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION + THE SUNNYVALE POLICE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE A REPORTERS' STORY? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/youtubecom-private-business-of-public.html
When John entered Judge Socrates Manoukian's courtroom in June of 2011 to respond to the Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia complaint; John thought Socrates was a very interesting character no doubt. Socrates seemed very worldly and sophisticated; a person like James Finley who would be very interesting to sit down and eat a large group dinner with and pick his brain to see what makes him tick. Johns' Father was quite impressed with Judge Manoukian as well; commenting on how his last name is perhaps Armenian; and how Armenians at one point in history experienced the exact same kind of harassment and abuse John had experienced.
Judge Manoukians' arrogance (and/or narcissistic personality disorder? let's face it; almost all government folks suffer from it) seemed a bit off the charts; but that was no big deal because John has not only been in several rock bands dealing with countless ego-driven individuals; but he was also James Patrick Finleys' main drummer and best friend for many years -- therefore John is no stranger to this kind of behavior -- and by no means intimidated by it. John actually found it to be quite refreshing to encounter such an interesting character such as Judge Manoukian.
Judge Manoukians' arrogance (and/or narcissistic personality disorder? let's face it; almost all government folks suffer from it) seemed a bit off the charts; but that was no big deal because John has not only been in several rock bands dealing with countless ego-driven individuals; but he was also James Patrick Finleys' main drummer and best friend for many years -- therefore John is no stranger to this kind of behavior -- and by no means intimidated by it. John actually found it to be quite refreshing to encounter such an interesting character such as Judge Manoukian.
GO TO: 'GOD'S EMPTY CHAIR' BY JAMES PATRICK FINLEY @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/12/gods-empty-chair-by-james-patrick-finley.html
A neighbor/witness attended the court hearing to speak of Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia-related disturbances he had heard outside his residence on countless nights; but due to the fact that no constitutionally guaranteed "speedy trial" was going to occur on that day and/or any time soon; this important witness eventually returned to work. A court appointed "representative" was assigned to John (without Johns' knowledge); but all this representative did was attempt to tamper with the Defendant by trying to talk John into accepting the bogus restraining order.
Question: Since Jury Tampering is illegal; what about "Defendant Tampering"? What's the difference? This situation constitutes a bit more troublesome "quantum entanglement" on the part of the Judiciary; I suppose.
IN THE BEGINNING...After John called the City of Santa Clara about Mister Olenak trying to poison neighborhood ducks with bleach; three Santa Clara police officers (including Gabby Seagrave and Pablo Lopez) responded even though John did not call the police. Mister Olenak was angry about being exposed; then made criminal threats that he later followed up on and admitted to in court.
View the complaint filed by John: http://likroper.com/SCAN0027.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0026.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0027.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0029.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0030.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0031.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0032.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0033.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0034.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0035.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0036.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0037.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0038.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0039.JPG
In a nutshell: John was repeatedly and continually harassed for a number of years since getting involved in Santa Clara and/or Sunnyvale politics (go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-city-of-santa-clara-1333-lawrence.html) and/or filing a complaint against the Santa Clara Police department in 2007; where it appears John was ambushed by two vehicles laying in wait for him to return home; an ambush that was ultimately foiled by the high speed John was traveling on his bicycle at the time; and a cell phone deployed during the drive-by attack -- a cell phone which took no photos but which worked as a deterrent to scatter the criminals involved in this malicious late-night vandalism and near vehicular manslaughter.
Note: Adding to this; the Rebholtz family's daughter (who was also conspiratorially involved in the harassment and/or stalking of John (GO TO: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/stalking-by-rebholtzs-daughter.html) used what was essentially a false flag incident with segment and/or incident (GO TO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzXCvv9g9eI) adding on an extra layer of bullshit and/or negligence; as this false flag incident then spiraled out of control and turned into opportunistic and/or malicious false allegations by the Rebholtz's daughter; allegations she obviously made up based around this false flag incident.
Johns' neighbor Jane looked out her window one day to see a sniper in her backyard pointing a rifle towards Johns' residence FOR PICKING UP LITTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD!?! Let me say this again; THERE WAS A SNIPER IN JANES' BACKYARD BECAUSE JOHN WAS PICKING UP LITTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD; AND SUNNYVALE DPS HAD TONS OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT JOHNS' VOLUNTEER WEEKLY CLEANUP ACTIVITY! This kind of unnecessary "GI-JOE bullshit" is essentially what emboldened Rebholtzs' daughter. > Question: Why was Steve Henson at the Peterson field only the day of the SWAT team raid just before it occurred and never again since? Did Steve Henson have anything to do with this raid? GO TO: NEIGHBORHOOD COPWATCH: RESIDENCE ALMOST STORMED AND 'SUSPECT' SHOT AT FOR PICKING UP LITTER? @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzXCvv9g9eI
Between a SWAT team being called for feeding ducks and cleaning up litter on two separate incidents (GO TO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzXCvv9g9eI); an angry and scorned Junior High School principal with an agenda against whistle blowers trying to criminalize John for helping someone cross the street (GO TO: http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/petition-to-terminate-employment-of.html); and a slanderous, self-righteous supposed "social worker" trying to have John arrested for caring a little too much for his dying cat Buster (GO TO: http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-first-amendment-of-united-states.html + http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/rest-in-peace-buster-cat.html); John does not have to deal with and/or seriously acknowledge seemingly psychopathic and/or crazy fucking idiots like this.
QUESTIONABLE RESTRAINING ORDER COPIES -- these are copies of the temporary restraining order issued by Mrs. Rebholtz etc; clearly showing how John made a concerted effort to bring an end to the harassment he was experiencing for a number of years at that time. (go to: http://likroper.com/SCAN0008.JPG + http://likroper.com/SCAN0006.JPG + http://likroper.com/SCAN0007.JPG) QUESTION: How could this obvious evidence of John being harassed up to one year before this event have been overlooked? This misleading court filing is OBVIOUS evidence of the harassment John experienced; so why did the court system not act upon this at the onset and set try to the record straight? Did Judge Manoukian even read the transcripts? And if so; how could Judge Manoukian have overlooked this evidence?
Steve Henson and his son witnessed Jake Paolinetti and his friends (including at least one Rebholtz family member) yelling loudly and honking while driving by John's house at around 10 PM in early June 2010; leading to the flyer that went around the neighborhood to 40 or so houses, warning them of the attacks (note: a conversation between John and Steve Henson discussing the events in question can be heard @ http://likroper.com/Voice0006.amr)
It is obvious the Rebholtz family conspired and/or colluded with Officer Don Paolinetti and/or the members of the Paolinetti family to cover up and/or suppress evidence regarding what had been happening to John for over a year at that time. Mrs. Rebholtz told John "I don't think you're a criminal"; failing to realize she just made herself a conspiratorial criminal by obstructing justice with her son. Perhaps the main problem we are confronting at this moment in time is our society has a hard time criminalizing soccer mom types like Hillary Clinton and/or Mrs. Rebholtz.
NOTE: While this action is not necessarily about appealing this (sham) restraining order; if there is any appeal of sorts of the questionable June 2011 restraining order served; it would be in the bait-and-switch nature where it clearly says that John "cannot come near the house" (which John only did one time last year to tell Mrs Rebholtz of the harassment John had been experiencing over the years) conflicted by another part of the order which says John can come over to the house and talk to them if done in a civil manner (which he has no intentions of ever doing and only did to tell Mrs. Rebholtz to keep her idiot sons away from Johns' place of residence). This is a confusing dialogue that could easily turn ugly if followed by John. John had to do what he did on that June 2011 day to end the harassment; as John in a sense "shook the shit bag" until all of the shit came out -- as nothing else would have stopped this rampant abuse which continued long thereafter. (GO TO: INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/incident-on-15-december-2013.html).
John even contacted Officer Jim Carrell in an attempt to get him to show up in court and represent him; but Officer Carrel never got back to John. Officer Carrell then retired shortly thereafter; likely encouraged by his superiors to help make this messy situation "go away". John had been emailing Officer Carrel and the Department of Justice (DOJ) for many months to keep them posted about the stalking and harassment; but the DOJ neglected to prevent the abuse and never responded.
§ 1986. ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT ~ Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; etc > See: Federal Civil Rights Statutes @ http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sup_01_42_10_21_20_I.html
SEE ALSO: NEGLIGENCE / Failure to exercise the care toward others that a reasonable or prudent person would use in the same circumstances, or taking action that such a reasonable person would not, resulting in unintentional harm to another. Negligence forms a common basis for civil litigation, with plaintiffs suing for damages based on a variety of injuries, from physical or property damage to business errors and miscalculations. The injured party (plaintiff) must prove: 1) that the allegedly negligent defendant had a duty to the injured party or to the general public, 2) that the defendant's action (or failure to act) was not what a reasonably prudent person would have done, and 3) that the damages were directly ("proximately") caused by the negligence. An added factor in the formula for determining negligence is whether the damages were "reasonably foreseeable" at the time of the alleged carelessness. (See also: contributory negligence, comparative negligence, foreseeable risk, damages, negligence per se, gross negligence, family purpose doctrine, joint tortfeasors, tortfeasor, tort, liability, res ipsa loquitur) > GO TO: http://www.nolo.com/dictionary/negligence-term.html + GROSS NEGLIGENCE: A lack of care that demonstrates reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, which is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence, and can affect the amount of damages. > GO TO: http://www.nolo.com/dictionary/gross-negligence-term.html
SEE ALSO: Excerpts from the Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich "I have been a lawyer since 1985. I went to law school at night while I was in the insurance business, and "involuntarily" went into private practice in 1993 with zero experience as a practicing lawyer. Thrust into the system and trying to survive, one of the first things I noticed was how unjust our criminal justice system is. Because of the sheer volume of cases, another problem I will discuss later, there is intense pressure to coerce defendants to plead to something. This pressure comes from 4 sides: prosecution attorneys, defense attorneys (yes, I said it), judges, and financial. A substantial percentage of those who plead out would be found not guilty if they were taken to trial, but these newly minted criminals entered their guilty pleas for expedience, usually financial or familial. It is dead wrong. Dead f$&@/Ingo wrong. Then I heard about Kalief Browder, and I sit here ashamed that I have participated in this travesty, that the pressure of money has put us in this position. Read about this young man and ask yourself why. Please..." http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalief_Browder
NOTE: Kevin Mayes wrote: "that's how the system is; they know you cant afford an attorney so they give you a public one who works for them. Then they get you to plea out so that they can get you out of the courtroom..."
Sunshine Dazey Marlin wrote: "So---I have no clue how I got a hearing within a week, and on Halloween, with an agency that charged me nothing and the private judge overturned the previous judge and district attorneys charges. Angels are helping me and GOD is clearing my path. I walked out in total shock!! Take that my exs biotch...told you I don't lay down so you can walk on me...sorry you spent two years and 400 letters to try and put me down...must be frustrating for you my dear. The truth always wins and my record keeping too! Plus it's great that I have never had a criminal record. That's the key to success. Yes..it was a great Halloween!..." Question: Why was it so easy for Daisy to acquire free legal services; while John is still having a hard time getting a lawyer to even piss on him -- even though John has likely had his civil rights violated more than anyone else in the Santa Clara Valley?
Sunnyvale police absolutely REFUSED to do their job for many years; and this 'sham' restraining order was all part of the coverup. Part of our in/unalienable rights as American citizens is the right to protect our property; a right which no living being can be denied. Adding to this; stalking is against the law in the State of California; especially if it is non-coincidental and conspiratorial.
Question: Since Jury Tampering is illegal; what about "Defendant Tampering"? What's the difference? This situation constitutes a bit more troublesome "quantum entanglement" on the part of the Judiciary; I suppose.
IN THE BEGINNING...After John called the City of Santa Clara about Mister Olenak trying to poison neighborhood ducks with bleach; three Santa Clara police officers (including Gabby Seagrave and Pablo Lopez) responded even though John did not call the police. Mister Olenak was angry about being exposed; then made criminal threats that he later followed up on and admitted to in court.
View the complaint filed by John: http://likroper.com/SCAN0027.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0026.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0027.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0029.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0030.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0031.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0032.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0033.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0034.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0035.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0036.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0037.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0038.JPG -- http://likroper.com/SCAN0039.JPG
In a nutshell: John was repeatedly and continually harassed for a number of years since getting involved in Santa Clara and/or Sunnyvale politics (go to: http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-city-of-santa-clara-1333-lawrence.html) and/or filing a complaint against the Santa Clara Police department in 2007; where it appears John was ambushed by two vehicles laying in wait for him to return home; an ambush that was ultimately foiled by the high speed John was traveling on his bicycle at the time; and a cell phone deployed during the drive-by attack -- a cell phone which took no photos but which worked as a deterrent to scatter the criminals involved in this malicious late-night vandalism and near vehicular manslaughter.
John is about 99.9 percent certain the individuals involved in the night time attack were essentially put up to it by rogue members of the Santa Clara police department (Pablo Lopez; Don Paolinetti etc) seeking revenge for John's complaint filing.
Johns' neighbor Jane looked out her window one day to see a sniper in her backyard pointing a rifle towards Johns' residence FOR PICKING UP LITTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD!?! Let me say this again; THERE WAS A SNIPER IN JANES' BACKYARD BECAUSE JOHN WAS PICKING UP LITTER IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD; AND SUNNYVALE DPS HAD TONS OF PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT JOHNS' VOLUNTEER WEEKLY CLEANUP ACTIVITY! This kind of unnecessary "GI-JOE bullshit" is essentially what emboldened Rebholtzs' daughter. > Question: Why was Steve Henson at the Peterson field only the day of the SWAT team raid just before it occurred and never again since? Did Steve Henson have anything to do with this raid? GO TO: NEIGHBORHOOD COPWATCH: RESIDENCE ALMOST STORMED AND 'SUSPECT' SHOT AT FOR PICKING UP LITTER? @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzXCvv9g9eI
Between a SWAT team being called for feeding ducks and cleaning up litter on two separate incidents (GO TO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzXCvv9g9eI); an angry and scorned Junior High School principal with an agenda against whistle blowers trying to criminalize John for helping someone cross the street (GO TO: http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/petition-to-terminate-employment-of.html); and a slanderous, self-righteous supposed "social worker" trying to have John arrested for caring a little too much for his dying cat Buster (GO TO: http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-first-amendment-of-united-states.html + http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/rest-in-peace-buster-cat.html); John does not have to deal with and/or seriously acknowledge seemingly psychopathic and/or crazy fucking idiots like this.
QUESTIONABLE RESTRAINING ORDER COPIES -- these are copies of the temporary restraining order issued by Mrs. Rebholtz etc; clearly showing how John made a concerted effort to bring an end to the harassment he was experiencing for a number of years at that time. (go to: http://likroper.com/SCAN0008.JPG + http://likroper.com/SCAN0006.JPG + http://likroper.com/SCAN0007.JPG) QUESTION: How could this obvious evidence of John being harassed up to one year before this event have been overlooked? This misleading court filing is OBVIOUS evidence of the harassment John experienced; so why did the court system not act upon this at the onset and set try to the record straight? Did Judge Manoukian even read the transcripts? And if so; how could Judge Manoukian have overlooked this evidence?
THIS FLYER SHOWING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS WAS ON FILE AT THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR ROUGHLY ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THE JUNE 2011 INCIDENT
GO TO: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND/OR FELONY STALKING AND/OR UNCIVIL HARASSMENT (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/08/obstruction-of-justice-andor-domestic.html + OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS AND/OR ILLEGALLY
SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BY THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2010
AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2011 @
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/prior-knowledge-of-events-andor.html
Steve Henson and his son witnessed Jake Paolinetti and his friends (including at least one Rebholtz family member) yelling loudly and honking while driving by John's house at around 10 PM in early June 2010; leading to the flyer that went around the neighborhood to 40 or so houses, warning them of the attacks (note: a conversation between John and Steve Henson discussing the events in question can be heard @ http://likroper.com/Voice0006.amr)
SEE ALSO: CAUSE AND EFFECT AND/OR ACTION-REACTION? @
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/09/cause-and-effect-andor-action-reaction.html
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/09/cause-and-effect-andor-action-reaction.html
It is obvious the Rebholtz family conspired and/or colluded with Officer Don Paolinetti and/or the members of the Paolinetti family to cover up and/or suppress evidence regarding what had been happening to John for over a year at that time. Mrs. Rebholtz told John "I don't think you're a criminal"; failing to realize she just made herself a conspiratorial criminal by obstructing justice with her son. Perhaps the main problem we are confronting at this moment in time is our society has a hard time criminalizing soccer mom types like Hillary Clinton and/or Mrs. Rebholtz.
NOTE: While this action is not necessarily about appealing this (sham) restraining order; if there is any appeal of sorts of the questionable June 2011 restraining order served; it would be in the bait-and-switch nature where it clearly says that John "cannot come near the house" (which John only did one time last year to tell Mrs Rebholtz of the harassment John had been experiencing over the years) conflicted by another part of the order which says John can come over to the house and talk to them if done in a civil manner (which he has no intentions of ever doing and only did to tell Mrs. Rebholtz to keep her idiot sons away from Johns' place of residence). This is a confusing dialogue that could easily turn ugly if followed by John. John had to do what he did on that June 2011 day to end the harassment; as John in a sense "shook the shit bag" until all of the shit came out -- as nothing else would have stopped this rampant abuse which continued long thereafter. (GO TO: INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 -- EV 133490020 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/incident-on-15-december-2013.html).
John even contacted Officer Jim Carrell in an attempt to get him to show up in court and represent him; but Officer Carrel never got back to John. Officer Carrell then retired shortly thereafter; likely encouraged by his superiors to help make this messy situation "go away". John had been emailing Officer Carrel and the Department of Justice (DOJ) for many months to keep them posted about the stalking and harassment; but the DOJ neglected to prevent the abuse and never responded.
§ 1986. ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT ~ Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; etc > See: Federal Civil Rights Statutes @ http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sup_01_42_10_21_20_I.html
SEE ALSO: NEGLIGENCE / Failure to exercise the care toward others that a reasonable or prudent person would use in the same circumstances, or taking action that such a reasonable person would not, resulting in unintentional harm to another. Negligence forms a common basis for civil litigation, with plaintiffs suing for damages based on a variety of injuries, from physical or property damage to business errors and miscalculations. The injured party (plaintiff) must prove: 1) that the allegedly negligent defendant had a duty to the injured party or to the general public, 2) that the defendant's action (or failure to act) was not what a reasonably prudent person would have done, and 3) that the damages were directly ("proximately") caused by the negligence. An added factor in the formula for determining negligence is whether the damages were "reasonably foreseeable" at the time of the alleged carelessness. (See also: contributory negligence, comparative negligence, foreseeable risk, damages, negligence per se, gross negligence, family purpose doctrine, joint tortfeasors, tortfeasor, tort, liability, res ipsa loquitur) > GO TO: http://www.nolo.com/dictionary/negligence-term.html + GROSS NEGLIGENCE: A lack of care that demonstrates reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, which is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence, and can affect the amount of damages. > GO TO: http://www.nolo.com/dictionary/gross-negligence-term.html
GO TO: OFFICER JIM CARRELL AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/05/officer-jim-carrells-prior-knowledge.html
SEE ALSO: Excerpts from the Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich "I have been a lawyer since 1985. I went to law school at night while I was in the insurance business, and "involuntarily" went into private practice in 1993 with zero experience as a practicing lawyer. Thrust into the system and trying to survive, one of the first things I noticed was how unjust our criminal justice system is. Because of the sheer volume of cases, another problem I will discuss later, there is intense pressure to coerce defendants to plead to something. This pressure comes from 4 sides: prosecution attorneys, defense attorneys (yes, I said it), judges, and financial. A substantial percentage of those who plead out would be found not guilty if they were taken to trial, but these newly minted criminals entered their guilty pleas for expedience, usually financial or familial. It is dead wrong. Dead f$&@/Ingo wrong. Then I heard about Kalief Browder, and I sit here ashamed that I have participated in this travesty, that the pressure of money has put us in this position. Read about this young man and ask yourself why. Please..." http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalief_Browder
NOTE: Kevin Mayes wrote: "that's how the system is; they know you cant afford an attorney so they give you a public one who works for them. Then they get you to plea out so that they can get you out of the courtroom..."
Sunshine Dazey Marlin wrote: "So---I have no clue how I got a hearing within a week, and on Halloween, with an agency that charged me nothing and the private judge overturned the previous judge and district attorneys charges. Angels are helping me and GOD is clearing my path. I walked out in total shock!! Take that my exs biotch...told you I don't lay down so you can walk on me...sorry you spent two years and 400 letters to try and put me down...must be frustrating for you my dear. The truth always wins and my record keeping too! Plus it's great that I have never had a criminal record. That's the key to success. Yes..it was a great Halloween!..." Question: Why was it so easy for Daisy to acquire free legal services; while John is still having a hard time getting a lawyer to even piss on him -- even though John has likely had his civil rights violated more than anyone else in the Santa Clara Valley?
GO TO: 'GOD'S EMPTY CHAIR' BY JAMES PATRICK FINLEY @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/12/gods-empty-chair-by-james-patrick-finley.html + AL COLLINS AND LEGAL SHIELD AND/OR PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INCORPORATED @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/al-collins-and-legal-shield-andor-pre.html
Sunnyvale police absolutely REFUSED to do their job for many years; and this 'sham' restraining order was all part of the coverup. Part of our in/unalienable rights as American citizens is the right to protect our property; a right which no living being can be denied. Adding to this; stalking is against the law in the State of California; especially if it is non-coincidental and conspiratorial.
GO TO: INCIDENT ON 8 JUNE 2016 / GANG ACTIVITY; CONSPIRACY; NON-COINCIDENTAL CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL HARASSMENT AND/OR STALKING; DISTURBING THE PEACE; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; WITNESS INTIMIDATION ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-8-june-2016-gang-activity.html
Many probate Court Cases in Department 3 have involved the seizure of real estate and other assets. The following videos each represent fraudulent evictions which have occurred in Department 19, and each have corresponding cases in Department 3, and each of these involved Santa Clara County Deputy County Counsel Attorney: Larry Kubo – SBN: 99873.
A whistleblower complaint was filed against Larry Kubo with Santa Clara County Counsel in respect to improprieties in case 1-12-CV226958 involving evidence that was suppressed in regards to suppression of evidence regarding City of San Jose code enforcement complaint filed on June 4th, 2012. County Policy Mandates that if the subject of complaint is a county counsel attorney, then the whistle blower complaint must be handled by the Santa Clara County Executive’s Office. Santa Clara County violated this policy by rejecting this valid complaint, and instead of following through pursuant to his legal obligation to properly supervise Mr. Kubo pursuant to CRPC 3-110, he violated County Board Policy 3.8 (and Rule 3-210) by dispatching Santa Clara County Sheriff Detective David Carroll to fabricate evidence to create an additional fraudulent court record: CASE: C1493022. This Fraudulent Court Record was created with the help of Judges David Cena & Rodney Jay Stafford and the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office. Judge Lori Pegg also was involved in the handling of C1493022 in possible violation of California Code of Civil Procedure 170, as she was formally acting county counsel, originally responsible for the mishandling of whistle blower complaint, by violating the policy mandating it be handled by County Executive (See also CRPC 3-110)
After searching Google.com regarding Judge Manoukian; some rather disturbing information came up; it turns out Judge Manoukian has -- among many other things -- allegedly taken bribes in return for favors. Judge Manoukian is also being accused of psychopathic behavior; drinking on the job and even racism. While it is oftentimes rather difficult to distinguish online truth from fiction; these findings are troubling to say the least. I take no pleasure in releasing this information; but it needs to be brought forth in the publics' interest nonetheless.
GO TO: CORRUPT CALIFORNIA JUDGE SOCRATES MANOUKIAN TAKING BRIBES / MANOUKIAN FAMILY TRUST @ https://corruptjudgebrianwalsh.wordpress.com/2015/02/23/corrupt-california-judge-socrates-manoukian-taking-bribes-manoukian-family-trust/ + “CORRUPTION ALERT: JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN” @ http://www.uglyjudge.com/judges-2/corrupt-california-judges/san-jose/judge-socrates-peter-manoukian/
Several court cases appear to have been deliberately mishandled by Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian, (Department 19), with the intent of manipulating the results of probate court cases in Department 3 (The Late Judge Thomas Cain). The table below demonstrates some of these cases:
The left column represents Department 19, and the Right Column represents Department 3. The rows to this table align the civil court cases in Department 19, and their corresponding affected probate court cases in Department 3.
Many probate Court Cases in Department 3 have involved the seizure of real estate and other assets. The following videos each represent fraudulent evictions which have occurred in Department 19, and each have corresponding cases in Department 3, and each of these involved Santa Clara County Deputy County Counsel Attorney: Larry Kubo – SBN: 99873.
A whistleblower complaint was filed against Larry Kubo with Santa Clara County Counsel in respect to improprieties in case 1-12-CV226958 involving evidence that was suppressed in regards to suppression of evidence regarding City of San Jose code enforcement complaint filed on June 4th, 2012. County Policy Mandates that if the subject of complaint is a county counsel attorney, then the whistle blower complaint must be handled by the Santa Clara County Executive’s Office. Santa Clara County violated this policy by rejecting this valid complaint, and instead of following through pursuant to his legal obligation to properly supervise Mr. Kubo pursuant to CRPC 3-110, he violated County Board Policy 3.8 (and Rule 3-210) by dispatching Santa Clara County Sheriff Detective David Carroll to fabricate evidence to create an additional fraudulent court record: CASE: C1493022. This Fraudulent Court Record was created with the help of Judges David Cena & Rodney Jay Stafford and the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office. Judge Lori Pegg also was involved in the handling of C1493022 in possible violation of California Code of Civil Procedure 170, as she was formally acting county counsel, originally responsible for the mishandling of whistle blower complaint, by violating the policy mandating it be handled by County Executive (See also CRPC 3-110)
GO TO: BRIBERY OF JUDGES @
GO TO: The People Vs. Judge Socrates Peter Manoukian @
https://www.facebook.com/The-People-Vs-Judge-Socrates-Peter-Manoukian-503285119736822/
https://www.facebook.com/The-People-Vs-Judge-Socrates-Peter-Manoukian-503285119736822/
In retrospect; Since Police Officers are by law held to a high standard regarding veracity, truthfulness, verity, sincerity, candor and/or honesty; where one lie can upend an entire career -- then Judges should obviously be held to an even higher standard of honesty than Police Officers.
RELATED LINKS: Honorable Judge Manoukian @ http://law.scu.edu/faculty/profile/manoukian-honorable-socrates/ + Son of Santa Clara County
judge killed in action in Afghanistan @
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_21284242/son-santa-clara-county-judge-killed-action-afghanistan
> Note: John was saddened when he heard about the death of Judge Manoukians' son a few years back; as John knows the pain involved in the loss of a loved one. > go to: LIST OF CASUALTIES @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/10/list-of-casualties.html + Santa Clara County Corruption EXPOSED 1 @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzO9GqnfG6c + BRIBERY OF JUDGES @ http://ccin2.menlopark.org/att-9338/bribery-of-judges.pdf
SEE ALSO: TIMELINE: ACTIVIST TARGETED FOR DISSENT? @
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/05/timeline-activist-targeted-for-dissent.html + AFTER RECEIVING A COMPLAINT; THE DEFENDANT MUST RESPOND WITH AN ANSWER?
@ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/05/after-receiving-complaint-defendant.html + DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/04/demand-for-case-remand.html + JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO, JUNIOR @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/judge-louis-amadeo-junior.html + DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER LISA STEINGART ON 18 OCT 2013 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/document-submitted-to-superior-court.html + AL COLLINS AND LEGAL SHIELD AND/OR PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INCORPORATED @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/03/al-collins-and-legal-shield-andor-pre.html + THANKS FOR NOTHING / PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html + STAYING ON POINT: A PATTERN OF NEGLIGENCE AND/OR CORRUPTION OVER TIME (continued) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/06/pattern-of-negligent-behavior-over-time.html + THANKS FOR NOTHING /
PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html + WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CALL THE COPS? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/12/this-is-what-happens-whenyou-call-cops.html + VARIOUS QUESTIONABLE COVER UPS BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND/OR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE AND/OR SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENTS ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/07/various-criminal-andor-illegal-cover.html + EX-SUNNYVALE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (DPS) OFFICER MATTHEW BENINGER & SON ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/ex-police-officer-matthew-beninger.html + ALL OTHER RELATED LINKS CAN BE SEEN @ http://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2016/11/all-other-related-links.html + http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/ + http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/
Deb Squadrito wrote: "I filed a corruption complaint against the Santa Clara Sheriffs Dept. 16 years ago!! Nothing was done. They go beyond corruption. They repeatedly covered up complaints about one of their officers sexually assaulting and harassing women. This allowed the officer to get away with it for over 10 years, till I had him arrested. But it did not end there. After he was arrested several (not all) did their best to destroy evidence. In the end I was victorious in getting a conviction. No federal investigation though. I had to give up my home (owned free and clear) and hide in another state before trial due to death threats after they told me "We cant protect you" They are like the mob..." GO TO: https://www.facebook.com/Santa-Clara-County-Crime-Family-499882993459818/
"I have had personal experience with this corrupt judge....this is REAL!..." "He is also in bed with slumlords...he is a bad guy..." "I will give you a name...Paul Pries." "You can also look into code enforcement, I know there is a paper trail...the aforementioned judge is complicit..." "Ah huh! Cedar Glen Apartments 2275 S Bascom Ave!!!!!" "and many more...and I see now he is acquiring more property with the aid of the redevelopment agency...it's shameful. I would look for ties familial or religious (Greek orthodox). They think the people are stupid..." " You're in deep with these guys, I hope you know. Prayers sent..." -- ANONYMOUS
QUESTION: "And this property is being acquired with Judge Manoukian's help? Illegally?"
-- SANTA CLARA COUNTY CRIME FAMILY
GO TO: "http://pdfsr.com/pdf/suspicious-transactions-by-santa-clara-county-superior-court-judge-socrates-peter-manoukian-possible" / "http://pdfsr.com/pdf/paul-pries-transanactions-santa-clara-county-grantor-grantee-index.pdf" / "https://www.bizapedia.com/addresses/1845-dry-creek-rd-campbell-ca-95008.html" / "http://pdfsr.com/pdf/maria-pries-financial-transactions-santa-clara-county-california-possibly-in-collusion-with-judge-so" / "http://pdfsr.com/pdf/terry-pries-financial-transactions-santa-clara-county-grantor-grantee-index-possible-collusion-with" -- SANTA CLARA COUNTY CRIME FAMILY + SEE ALSO: http://likroper.com/PRIES1.jpg
UPDATE: 29 july 2017 / THE PLOT THICKENS: Why is Santa Clara County Hiding Death and Crime? @ http://www.uglyjudge.com/santa-clara-county-hiding-death-crime/
UPDATE: 29 july 2017 / THE PLOT THICKENS: Why is Santa Clara County Hiding Death and Crime? @ http://www.uglyjudge.com/santa-clara-county-hiding-death-crime/
Brought to you by Brain Peak™ nootropic cognitive enhancer...
ReplyDelete