On 24 July 2007 John requested a hearing from the City of Santa Clara regarding a wrongful arrest/kidnapping by Officer Pablo Lopez. About 5 days later; John was unsuccessfully ambushed outside of his house
by two vehicles full of assailants who posed an active threat on the way home from the Oasis Nightclub on Sunday morning 29 July 2007. Two Sunnyvale DPS Officers responded and one of them said "someone must be mad at you". The same Officers came to the Oasis Nightclub the next night to provide support because John suspected someone from the club at the time.
Sunday, July 29, 2007 / LAYING IN WAIT, MALICIOUS VANDALISM
AND ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/07/malicious-vandalism-and-attempted.html
AND ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/07/malicious-vandalism-and-attempted.html
THE SMOKING GUN?
About two weeks later Johns’ windshield was shot up on yet another Saturday night – but Sunnyvale DPS responded and failed to make it a crime scene; instead blaming Johns’ web site writings for the malicious vandalism. Neighbor Albert Martinez witnessed this comment by a Sunnyvale DPS Officer.
Another responding Santa Clara Officer drove out of his jurisdiction on Thunderbird Avenue into Doon Court with the vehicle swerving down the street like the Officer was inebriated. This Officer apparently had “a little meeting” with members of the Rebholtz familia gang in Dune Court (he likely knows Don Paolinetti) which this Officer proceeded to negligently protect instead of vigorously question as the gang of suspicious youths walked out of Doon Court; down Thunderbird Avenue and onto Bluebird Avenue where the Paolinetti familia used to reside.
John called the Santa Clara Officers’ night shift manager and reported this incident. During this encounter John was pointing a camera towards the gang of youths to document their movement down the street; but the Officer warned John to not take any photos; calling John a “troublemaker” (?!?) and even questioning the presence of surveillance cameras on the side of Johns’ house. (?!?) John is still kicking himself for not making a video of this encounter; as John could have easily video recorded it and put it up on You Tube to embarrass this idiot Cop and help prove his case.
Note: Between the apparently retaliatory unsuccessful alleged Santa Clara/Police-sponsored ambush of John in July 2007; the gang of Rebholtz/Paolinetti familia punks in August 2007; and the Sunnyvale DPS Officers who unsuccessfully tried to preempt Johns’ August 2015 Amended Complaint submission – it seems retaliation against whistle blowers is a common (and dare I say ‘acceptable’) practice here in America – making John wonder if the ‘accidental’ death of Missy on Christmas Day 2015 had something to do with retaliation regarding Johns’ 2015 Amended Complaint submissions to the Superior Court of California.
IN A NUTSHELL: John was repeatedly and continually harassed for a number of years since getting involved in local politics and/or filing a complaint against the Santa Clara Police department in 2007; where it appears John was ambushed by two vehicles laying in wait for him to return home; an ambush that was ultimately foiled by the high speed John was traveling on his bicycle at the time; and a cell phone deployed during the drive-by attack. John called 911; but no incident number was acquired from the very concerned and helpful responding Sunnyvale (SDPS) Officers.
Another responding Santa Clara Officer drove out of his jurisdiction on Thunderbird Avenue into Doon Court with the vehicle swerving down the street like the Officer was inebriated. This Officer apparently had “a little meeting” with members of the Rebholtz familia gang in Dune Court (he likely knows Don Paolinetti) which this Officer proceeded to negligently protect instead of vigorously question as the gang of suspicious youths walked out of Doon Court; down Thunderbird Avenue and onto Bluebird Avenue where the Paolinetti familia used to reside.
John called the Santa Clara Officers’ night shift manager and reported this incident. During this encounter John was pointing a camera towards the gang of youths to document their movement down the street; but the Officer warned John to not take any photos; calling John a “troublemaker” (?!?) and even questioning the presence of surveillance cameras on the side of Johns’ house. (?!?) John is still kicking himself for not making a video of this encounter; as John could have easily video recorded it and put it up on You Tube to embarrass this idiot Cop and help prove his case.
Sunday, August 19, 2007 /THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT - THE FBI PUBLIC
CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @
http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/santa-clara-police-department-fbi.html
CORRUPTION HOTLINE - THE NIGHT SUPERVISOR AND THE GANG OF PUNKS @
http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/08/santa-clara-police-department-fbi.html
Note: Between the apparently retaliatory unsuccessful alleged Santa Clara/Police-sponsored ambush of John in July 2007; the gang of Rebholtz/Paolinetti familia punks in August 2007; and the Sunnyvale DPS Officers who unsuccessfully tried to preempt Johns’ August 2015 Amended Complaint submission – it seems retaliation against whistle blowers is a common (and dare I say ‘acceptable’) practice here in America – making John wonder if the ‘accidental’ death of Missy on Christmas Day 2015 had something to do with retaliation regarding Johns’ 2015 Amended Complaint submissions to the Superior Court of California.
GO TO: NSA SURVEILLANCE MALFEASANCE + 18 U.S. CODE § 245 -
FEDERALLY PROTECTED ACTIVITIES + 18 U.S. CODE § 1512 -
TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS; VICTIM OR INFORMANT ETC @
http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/08/nsa-surveillance-malfeasance-18-us-code.html
FEDERALLY PROTECTED ACTIVITIES + 18 U.S. CODE § 1512 -
TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS; VICTIM OR INFORMANT ETC @
http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/08/nsa-surveillance-malfeasance-18-us-code.html
IN A NUTSHELL: John was repeatedly and continually harassed for a number of years since getting involved in local politics and/or filing a complaint against the Santa Clara Police department in 2007; where it appears John was ambushed by two vehicles laying in wait for him to return home; an ambush that was ultimately foiled by the high speed John was traveling on his bicycle at the time; and a cell phone deployed during the drive-by attack. John called 911; but no incident number was acquired from the very concerned and helpful responding Sunnyvale (SDPS) Officers.
The cell phone took no photos but worked as a deterrent to scatter the criminals involved in this malicious late-night vandalism and near vehicular manslaughter. John is almost certain the individuals involved in the night time attack were essentially put up to it by rogue members of the Santa Clara police department (Pablo Lopez etc) seeking revenge for John's 24 July 2007 complaint filing.
View the complaint filed by John:
http://likroper.com/SCAN0027.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0026.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0029.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0030.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0031.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0032.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0033.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0034.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0035.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0036.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0037.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0038.JPG
http://likroper.com/SCAN0039.JPG
GO TO: CAUSE AND EFFECT AND/OR ACTION-REACTION? @
http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/09/cause-and-effect-andor-action-reaction.html
A few months after this July 2007 ambush; night time disturbances started occurring once again and continued for many years after this. These disturbances were later directly linked to the Paolinetti/Rebholtz familia.
(NOTE: Defendants have repeatedly and consistently denied
involvement in the harassment and/or stalking and/or menacing of
Plaintiff, while evidentiary material gathered by Plaintiff strongly
suggests otherwise. In other words; The City of Santa Clara has repeatedly denied involvement in the 29 July 2007 incident; even though evidence points directly to a City of Santa Clara/Police-related motive.
In all relevant respects, defendants acted in concert with each other in order to further their fraudulent scheme. Beginning not later than 2007, defendants, their various agents and employees, and their co-conspirators, formed an "enterprise" ["the Enterprise"] as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4).
That Enterprise has functioned as an organized association-in-fact for almost 10 years to achieve, through illegal means, the shared goals avoiding the consequences of their actions. (Santa Clara Police Department; Sunnyvale DPS; George Hills Company etc – Obstruction of Justice etc etc etc)
SEE ALSO:
NSA SURVEILLANCE MALFEASANCE + 18 U.S. CODE § 245 - FEDERALLY PROTECTED
ACTIVITIES + 18 U.S. CODE § 1512 - TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS; VICTIM OR
INFORMANT ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/08/nsa-surveillance-malfeasance-18-us-code.html
In order to avoid discovery of their fraudulent conduct and the possibility that they might be called to account for their conduct, Defendants engaged in a widespread scheme to frustrate public scrutiny by making false and deceptive statements and by concealing documents etc that they knew would have exposed their public campaign of deceit. This scheme included among many other things; making false and deceptive statements to the public etc).
In layman's terms; A) a group of individuals connected to the City of Santa Clara allegedly conspired to kill John in July of 2007 for filing a complaint against their fine city; and B) since the City of Sunnyvale was also connected to the initial wrongful June 2006 arrest that led to the complaint filing by John -- SDPS reputation was at stake as well -- therefore SDPS has done a very fancy dance to avoid scrutiny even though SDPS likely had nothing to do with the unsuccessful July 2007 ambush.
Adding to this; the George Hills Company sat by idly reading all about it while taking no action to bring about much needed third-party justice to the situation; likely because they are somehow legally allowed to do so.
Could the unsuccessful July 2007 ambush of John have anything to do with; 1) Pablo Lopez showing up at Johns' front door with a gun asking why John filed the complaint a few days after filing said complaint in July 2007? And/or 2) the Santa Clara police cruiser (Pablo again?) that followed the USPS truck that delivered the rejection letter from the City of Santa Clara down Thunderbird Avenue out of its' jurisdiction a few days after the ambush? Or perhaps 3) the Paolinetti/Rebholtz familia? Etc?
Regardless; the June 2006 wrongful arrest of John included a literal swarm of collusive Santa Clara and Sunnyvale Police Officers waiting around several corners.
It also included ducks the ex-Mayor of Santa Clara Judy Nadler once gave John permission to feed at a City Council meeting (right before ex-Mayor Nadler suspiciously and suddenly quit politics right after the messy 1333 Lawrence Expressway fiasco and started working for Santa Clara University at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics program in Government Ethics. (!?!)
And it mainly included Santa Clara Officers Pablo Lopez etc -- and several SDPS Officers -- all knowing that Mister Olenak had viciously attacked John without arrest in 2006; and their need to cover all of this up through abuse of their power.
GO TO: OUTLAW DUCK FEEDER? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/outlaw-duck-feeder.html + JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO, JUNIOR @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/judge-louis-amadeo-junior.html + Thursday, June 07, 2007 / MISTER OLENAK'S ADMISSION OF GUILT @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/06/mister-olenaks-admission-of-guilt.html + SEE ALSO: THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA + 1333 LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY + THE MARINA PLAYA APARTMENTS ETC = LAX ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-city-of-santa-clara-1333-lawrence.html
NOTE: BRIAN COLLETTI was killed by Santa Clara police a few years back. The article about the event in the local newspaper was one paragraph long, and no officers were ever suspended due to the event. The "official" Santa Clara police department version was when officers confronted Brian; Brian became abusive and combative; and while placing him in "the wrap" restraining device; Brian then supposedly fell and hit his head. But Brians' parents had an independent autopsy done; and that coroner said that he had 14 separate blows to the head!?
GO TO: REST IN PEACE, BRIAN COLLETTI @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/04/rest-in-peace-brian-colletti.html + http://www.petersonhigh.com/3/miscellaneous1.htm
EXCERPTS FROM Sunday, July 29, 2007 / LAYING IN WAIT, MALICIOUS VANDALISM AND ATTEMPTED VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER blog post: "John was going to meet a few friends at a local Denny's after karaoke, but 'luckily' John came home for a minute first instead at around 2 am this morning, and as John was going into the house John heard a loud thumping noise coming from the side yard. John went out to the street and two vehicles (a very large SUV type vehicle with what appeared to be multi-colored paint and a lights on the side, along with a much smaller car following it) came rushing around the corner as John grabbed his camera phone and attempted to take a photo; the lead truck/SUV vehicle literally tried to run over John, but luckily John moved out of the way just in time. (The second vehicle appeared to be an old-style Chevrolet pickup truck with a black camper shell)..."
(An independent investigation has been conducted to determine if said Defendants did
commit stated crimes and/or civil offenses. Reports of the investigation, attached hereto and incorporated by reference, show probable cause that Defendants did commit various crimes and/or civil offenses)
 |
| OFFICER PABLO LOPEZ WAS INVESTIGATED BY SCPD RIGHT AFTER JOHNS' JUNE 2006 WRONGFUL ARREST |
"OVERARCHING CONSPIRATORIAL MULTIFARIOUS MALFEASANT MISCONDUCT..."
ReplyDeleteCALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 – DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SECTION 28. (a) The People of the State of California find and declare that the enactment of comprehensive provisions and laws ensuring a bill of rights for victims of crime, including safeguards in the criminal justice system to fully protect those rights, is a matter of grave statewide concern. The rights of victims pervade the criminal justice system, encompassing not only the right to restitution from the wrongdoers for financial losses suffered as a result of criminal acts, but also the more basic expectation that persons who commit felonious acts causing injury to innocent victims will be appropriately detained in custody, tried by the courts, and sufficiently punished so that the public safety is protected and encouraged as a goal of highest importance. Such public safety extends to public primary, elementary, junior high, and senior high school campuses, where students and staff have the right to be safe and secure in their persons. To accomplish these goals, broad reforms in the procedural treatment of accused persons and the disposition and sentencing of convicted persons are necessary and proper as deterrents to criminal behavior and to serious disruption of people’s lives.
(b) Restitution. It is the unequivocal intention of the People of the State of California that all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity shall have the right to restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes for losses they suffer. Restitution shall be ordered from the convicted persons in every case, regardless of the sentence or disposition imposed, in which a crime victim suffers a loss, unless compelling and extraordinary reasons exist to the contrary. The Legislature shall adopt provisions to implement this section during the calendar year following adoption of this section.
GO TO: CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION / ARTICLE 1 – DECLARATION OF RIGHTS @
http://ag.ca.gov/victimservices/pdf/CaConstArtI28.pdf