Monday, February 6, 2017

AMENDED COMPLAINT #2 / TABLE OF CONTENTS


1) DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND  
http://likroper.com/DEMANDFORCASEREMAND1.wpd  

and/or GO TO: DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND #2 @
http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/02/demand-for-case-remand-2.html

2) PREFACE
http://likroper.com/PREFACE1.wpd

3) AMENDED COMPLAINT #2
http://likroper.com/AMENDEDCOMPLAINT2A.wpd

4) ATTACHMENTS
http://likroper.com/ATTACHMENTS1.wpd

5) ATTACHED DOCUMENTS
 (not included)

6) SECRET FILE
 (classified information)

John is requesting a preliminary hearing regarding the subject matter in this complaint. Required reciprocal documentation is requested as well. Defendants have committed acts that constitute a chargeable offense and/or have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation before a government agency. Concern for what has occurred; as opposed to concern for what has been said; needs to be officially addressed -- as actions speak louder than words; and all words are legal under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The bottom line: it's a whole lot easier to hold a fire hose and/or take a piss than it is to be a good Police Officer.

STRIKE THREE YOU'RE OUT!? > Beninger + Struble Familia + Amadeo Junior + Olenak Familia + Manoukian + Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia = Strike Three; You're Out!  

1) Court documents show Mister Struble admitted to attacking John by initially corroborating Johns' account of the 1998 incident to Sunnyvale DPS Officer Discher; attempting to run over ducks right after strong local case law had been created placing a priority on the protection of these waterfowl right after a then recent incident at a Campbell, California car wash.  Adding to this; ex-Sunnyvale DPS Officer is a child molesting freak who recently gave his own abused son a restraining order; and also failed to protect and serve John as required.

GO TO: EX-SUNNYVALE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY (DPS) OFFICER MATTHEW BENINGER & SON ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/ex-police-officer-matthew-beninger.html

2) Mister Olenak admitted to attacking John at a 2006 "mob style sit down" administrative hearing in front of two billy club-carrying Santa Clara Police Officers and Judge Louis Amadeo, Junior (a hearing where John had $230 dollars extorted out of him; and Johns' Father was held against his will and tormented by the Olenak Familia right after this said "mob style sit down" trial. 

GO TO: JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR @  

3) The Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familias obstructed justice and/or conspired with Sunnyvale DPS and the Santa Clara Police Department to violate Johns' Unalienable (etc) Rights; slandering Johns' good reputation in the process with blatant lies and mischaracterization. Adding to this; apparently John is not the only individual questioning the actions of the 'Honorable' Judge Socrates Manoukian.

All defendants have committed acts that constitute a chargeable offense and/or have engaged in fraud and/or willful misrepresentation before a government agency. Psychological testing is requested for all defendants who have exhibited psychopathic tendencies and/or who are a harm to themselves or others. 

Note: After the said "mob sit down style" Administrative hearing with Louis Amadeo, Junior in the City of Santa Clara back in 2007; John found out that Judge Amadeo was actually hired by the City of Santa Clara to perform his services; meaning there was a MASSIVE conflict of interest where Judge Amadeo was actually hired to come up with judgements favorable to the City of Santa Clara. It should appear obvious that Mister Amadeo was not a true unbiased third party; and instead was hired to help avoid inevitable lawsuits caused by their crooked cops. GO TO: ARE YOU BEING DELPHIED? @ http://neighborhood-copwatch.blogspot.com/2007/10/are-you-being-delphied.html

SEE ALSO: THANKS FOR NOTHING / PART II -- MOTION FOR EXPUNGEMENT AND/OR FACTUAL INNOCENCE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/thanks-for-nothing-part-ii-motion-for.html

Shortly after posting the "UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS" link below back in December 2017; Sunnyvale DPS responded to complaints regarding people living in RVs etc on Dunford Way -- people who were not necessarily bothering anyone in particular -- they are just low income individuals. (The Magna Carta was perhaps the first large-scale effort aimed at addressing the existence and/or regulation of class-based discrimination; a timeless lesson which is obviously often forgotten to this day).

GO TO: THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS @ 

QUESTION: Why is it when members of the Rebholtz/Paolinetti Familia were bothering someone in particular (John) nothing was done to intervene and stop the harassment/stalking/menacing?

Back when John was in high school; John played in a rock band which performed at several parties all over the Santa Clara Valley during his sophomore year; as one gig led to another and so on and so forth. But almost every time the band played; police would show up and stop the band; threatening to confiscate equipment if the band did not cease and desist. So why did the Santa Clara Police Department and/or Sunnyvale DPS fail to visit the Rebholtz/Paolinetti familia residences and at very least say (in other words; way before March 2010): 

"Good evening. We have been receiving complaints from a concerned neighbor about repeated non-coincidental night time disturbances and/or harassment and/or stalking allegedly originating from this residence. We don't know what the truth is; but if any of these purported disturbances are originating from this residence; and/or if they continue unabated -- someone is going to get into some serious trouble..."
WARNING: GOVERNMENT-SANCTIONED RACE; GENDER AND/OR CLASS-BASED (ETC) DISCRIMINATION NOW IN EFFECT -- SO MUCH FOR ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE. SEE ALSO: UNETHICAL, EGREGIOUS, OVERARCHING, CONSPIRATORIAL, MULTIFARIOUS AND MALFEASANT ETC MISCONDUCT...

QUESTIONS: What do the people who are officially reviewing this case think this is really all about? It is rather multi-dimensional; but manages to stay on point. I know what it means to me; but what does it mean to you? Also; the following link seems like yet another a lame attempt -- this time by the Santa Clara County Sheriffs' Department -- to sway the opinions and/or control the dialogue (and/or therefore the minds) of the highly impressionable investigators reviewing this case. > CLICK HERE + SEE ALSO: http://likroper.com/SUNNYVALECLAIMFORM1.wpd

<><><>
RELATED STORY: In the case that you actually trust those who may be investigating this claim: "Fifty-two years after the President’s death, declassified documents show that the CIA were in communication with alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s murder in 1963, and they were monitoring his mail since 1959.  

Not only that but John McCone, who was Chief of the CIA at the time, allegedly hid evidence from the Warren commission, set up by Lyndon Johnson to investigate JFK’s assassination. The spymaster and other senior CIA officials are accused of withholding ‘incendiary’ information from the commission and therefore perverting the course of justice. The CIA has admitted this.  

GO TO: The CIA Admits Covering Up JFK Assassination @  
  
"ACTIONS AND/OR INACTIONS EQUAL EVIDENCE --
BECAUSE ACTIONS AND/OR INACTIONS OFTEN SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS..."
at 1 comment:

WITH LIBERTY INJUSTICE FOR ALL?

"Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system’s process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them. The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed..."

"The sullying of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer-driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served. Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low-to-middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America. 

What would our Founding Fathers think? This devolution of lawmaking by the judiciary has been subtle, taking place incrementally over decades. But today, it’s engrained in our legal system, and few even question it. But the result is clear. Individuals can no longer participate in the legal system..."

“The once honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.” 


(A lawyer from Tuscon, Arizona, John Fitzgerald Molloy (b. 1917) was elected to the Superior Court bench where he served for seven years as both a juvenile court and trial bench judge. He subsequently was elected to the Court of Appeals where he authored over 300 appellate opinions, including the final Miranda decision for the Arizona Supreme Court. During that period, he also served as president of the Arizona Judge’s Association. After 12 years, Molloy returned to private practice to become president of the largest law firm in southern Arizona. His book has received widespread praise for its candor and disquieting truths.) 

at No comments:

DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND #2


Because Plaintiff concludes The Superior Court of California did not accord appropriate deference to the relevant Federal and/or State etc regulations; Plaintiff therefore asks for the reversal of this case's dismissal of  Plaintiff's Amended Complaint claim. We have concluded The Superior Court of California used the wrong evidentiary standard in assessing Plaintiff's case; therefore we vacate its denial and remand for consideration under the correct standard. We therefore demand The Superior Court of California remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

GO TO: DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND @  

"The courts have found a "pattern or practice" when the evidence establishes that the discriminatory actions were the defendant's regular practice, rather than an isolated instance. This does not mean that the Department has to prove that a defendant always discriminates or that a large number of people have been affected. A "pattern or practice" means that the defendant has a policy of discriminating, even if the policy is not always followed. The courts have held that the Attorney General has discretion to decide what constitutes an issue of "general public importance," and the courts will not second-guess that decision. Thus, the Department can bring suit even when a discriminatory act has occurred only once, if it affects a group of persons and the Department believes that the discrimination raises an issue of general public importance..."

SEE ALSO: A PATTERN OR PRACTICE OF DISCRIMINATION: http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/10/a-pattern-or-practice-of-discrimination.html

WITH LIBERTY INJUSTICE FOR ALL? "Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system’s process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them. The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed..."

"The sullying of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer-driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served. Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low-to-middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America. 

What would our Founding Fathers think? 

This devolution of lawmaking by the judiciary has been subtle, taking place incrementally over decades. But today, it’s engrained in our legal system, and few even question it. But the result is clear. Individuals can no longer participate in the legal system..."

“The once honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.” > go to: http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/03/13/retired-arizona-judge-reveals-corruption-in-legal-system/ 

(A lawyer from Tuscon, Arizona, John Fitzgerald Molloy (b. 1917) was elected to the Superior Court bench where he served for seven years as both a juvenile court and trial bench judge. He subsequently was elected to the Court of Appeals where he authored over 300 appellate opinions, including the final Miranda decision for the Arizona Supreme Court. During that period, he also served as president of the Arizona Judge’s Association. After 12 years, Molloy returned to private practice to become president of the largest law firm in southern Arizona. His book has received widespread praise for its candor and disquieting truths... > READ MORE @ GO TO: SECRET FBI RECORDINGS @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/08/secret-fbi-recordings-etc.html) NOTE: If government wants John to follow the law of the land; then government needs to follow the law of the land as well.
at 1 comment: