“The government has utterly failed to justify a warrantless electronic surveillance program that recorded private conversations spoken in hushed tones by judges, attorneys and court staff” as well as the five targets of the investigation, said U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco. This ruling came 10 days after a contrasting decision by Chief U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton of Oakland, who upheld FBI recordings of conversations among defendants charged with bid-rigging at the Alameda County Courthouse in Oakland and the Contra Costa County Courthouse in Martinez..."
GO TO: Judge bars secret FBI recordings in alleged bid-rigging plot @ http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Judge-bars-secret-FBI-recordings-in-alleged-9015186.php
NOTE: It's interesting how the US government has used secret recordings to secure countless criminal convictions; while Judge Breyer now has his doubts about this practice. These various convictions include the usage of secret/private audio-video CCTV video surveillance; which is ubiquitous in the public domain at this point. Are these various anachronistic criminal convictions now in question due to this ruling; and if so who needs to be let out of prison immediately?
And what about dash cams on police cars monitoring police activity; recording audio and video footage; or police body cameras? Or smart phones in public accidentally recording the conversations of people around them? Or the NSAs' mass-surveillance program going on since 911; which is mainly about financial advantage for corporations? In other words; what about your Smart Phone and/or TV being used to remotely spy on you? > Go to: http://www.forbes.com/sites/davelewis/2015/02/10/is-your-tv-spying-on-you/ + http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34444233
Adding to this; the secret FBI recordings in question were made within the public domain; where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. The ruling, if it stands, will prohibit prosecutors from using the secret recordings as evidence. But the problem is; JOHN IS NOT A PROSECUTOR!
And what about dash cams on police cars monitoring police activity; recording audio and video footage; or police body cameras? Or smart phones in public accidentally recording the conversations of people around them? Or the NSAs' mass-surveillance program going on since 911; which is mainly about financial advantage for corporations? In other words; what about your Smart Phone and/or TV being used to remotely spy on you? > Go to: http://www.forbes.com/sites/davelewis/2015/02/10/is-your-tv-spying-on-you/ + http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34444233
SEE ALSO: TITLE 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1831 / NSA SPYING FACILITATES CORPORATE-SPONSORED PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THEFT @
http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/04/nsa-spying-facilitates-corporate.html
http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/04/nsa-spying-facilitates-corporate.html
Adding to this; the secret FBI recordings in question were made within the public domain; where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy. The ruling, if it stands, will prohibit prosecutors from using the secret recordings as evidence. But the problem is; JOHN IS NOT A PROSECUTOR!
The 5 defendants in question were essentially rich real estate investors; not low income crack dealers from Compton, California (for instance); therefore adding a strong class-based discrimination element to this. And the defendants lowering their voices at the courthouse was nothing more than an admission of guilt of sorts because if they had nothing to hide it wouldn't matter whether anyone was listening to them.
And since all relevant evidence must be submitted; no court should ever ignore such important exculpatory evidence and/or involve themselves in what can be seen as a cover up of sorts to bring about a desired result; whatever that desired result may be.
SEE ALSO: Conversation between John and neighbor Steve Henson [who is a good friend of Officer Don Paolinetti] discussing some of the events in question can be heard @ http://likroper.com/Voice0006.amr (Note: This recording has been submitted to the California State Attorney General Kamala Harris) + VIDEO RECORDING @ THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB / 18 JUNE 2016 @ http://likroper.com/18JUNE2016.mp4 and/or GO TO: INCIDENT ON 18 JUNE 2016 / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA = PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-18-june-2016-oasis.html + YOUTUBE.COM: PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION + THE SUNNYVALE POLICE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE A REPORTERS' STORY? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/youtubecom-private-business-of-public.html + OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND/OR FELONY STALKING AND/OR UNCIVIL HARASSMENT (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/08/obstruction-of-justice-andor-domestic.html + SEE ALSO: OFFICER JIM CARRELL AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/05/officer-jim-carrells-prior-knowledge.html
NOTE: These secret recordings were done as a result of police inaction and/or negligence; with local police repeatedly refusing to investigate on Johns' behalf; therefore causing John to take matters into his own hands. Johns' privacy was clearly invaded first; so why should it matter who's privacy was later invaded in order to prove Johns' privacy was invaded first?
"Where a lower court’s failure to act obstructs litigants from having their claims adjudicated and ultimately brought before a higher court, this Court and the courts of appeals have consistently issued writs of mandamus so that the legal process can proceed. In Ex parte Crane, 5 Pet. 190 (1831), this Court issued a writ of mandamus to compel a lower court to render its judgment, because failing to do so prevented the petitioner from pursuing an appeal..." > go to: https://nevadastatepersonnelwatch.wordpress.com/tag/ty-robben / > NEVADA STATE PERSONELL WATCH: THE TRUTH FROM THE LAND OF LEGAL HOOKERS AND GAMBLING...
"Our Constitution intended that only elected lawmakers be permitted to create law. Yet judges create their own law in the judicial system based on their own opinions and rulings. It’s called case law, and it is churned out daily through the rulings of judges. When a judge hands down a ruling and that ruling survives appeal with the next tier of judges, it then becomes case law, or legal precedent. This now happens so consistently that we’ve become more subject to the case rulings of judges rather than to laws made by the lawmaking bodies outlined in our Constitution.
This case-law system is a constitutional nightmare because it continuously modifies constitutional intent. For lawyers, however, it creates endless business opportunities. That’s because case law is technically complicated and requires a lawyer’s expertise to guide and move you through the system. The judicial system may begin with enacted laws, but the variations that result from a judge’s application of case law all too often change the ultimate meaning..."
"When a lawyer puts on a robe and takes the bench, he or she is called a judge. But in reality, when judges look down from the bench they are lawyers looking upon fellow members of their fraternity. In any other area of the free-enterprise system, this would be seen as a conflict of interest. When a lawyer takes an oath as a judge, it merely enhances the ruling class of lawyers and judges. First of all, in Maricopa and Pima counties, judges are not elected but nominated by committees of lawyers, along with concerned citizens. How can they be expected not to be beholden to those who elevated them to the bench? When they leave the bench, many return to large and successful law firms that leverage their names and relationships..."
"The concept of “time” has been converted into enormous revenue for lawyers. The profession has adopted elaborate systems where clients are billed for a lawyer’s time in six-minute increments. The paralegal profession is another brainchild of the fraternity, created as an additional tracking and revenue center. High powered firms have departmentalized their services into separate profit centers for probate and trusts, trial, commercial, and so forth..."
"Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system’s process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them. The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed..."
"The sullying of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer-driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served. Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low-to-middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America. What would our Founding Fathers think?
This devolution of lawmaking by the judiciary has been subtle, taking place incrementally over decades. But today, it’s engrained in our legal system, and few even question it. But the result is clear. Individuals can no longer participate in the legal system..."
“The once honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.” > go to: http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/03/13/retired-arizona-judge-reveals-corruption-in-legal-system/
And since all relevant evidence must be submitted; no court should ever ignore such important exculpatory evidence and/or involve themselves in what can be seen as a cover up of sorts to bring about a desired result; whatever that desired result may be.
SEE ALSO: Conversation between John and neighbor Steve Henson [who is a good friend of Officer Don Paolinetti] discussing some of the events in question can be heard @ http://likroper.com/Voice0006.amr (Note: This recording has been submitted to the California State Attorney General Kamala Harris) + VIDEO RECORDING @ THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB / 18 JUNE 2016 @ http://likroper.com/18JUNE2016.mp4 and/or GO TO: INCIDENT ON 18 JUNE 2016 / THE OASIS NIGHTCLUB IN SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA = PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-18-june-2016-oasis.html + YOUTUBE.COM: PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION + THE SUNNYVALE POLICE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE A REPORTERS' STORY? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/youtubecom-private-business-of-public.html + OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND/OR FELONY STALKING AND/OR UNCIVIL HARASSMENT (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/08/obstruction-of-justice-andor-domestic.html + SEE ALSO: OFFICER JIM CARRELL AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE ETC @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/05/officer-jim-carrells-prior-knowledge.html
NOTE: These secret recordings were done as a result of police inaction and/or negligence; with local police repeatedly refusing to investigate on Johns' behalf; therefore causing John to take matters into his own hands. Johns' privacy was clearly invaded first; so why should it matter who's privacy was later invaded in order to prove Johns' privacy was invaded first?
"Where a lower court’s failure to act obstructs litigants from having their claims adjudicated and ultimately brought before a higher court, this Court and the courts of appeals have consistently issued writs of mandamus so that the legal process can proceed. In Ex parte Crane, 5 Pet. 190 (1831), this Court issued a writ of mandamus to compel a lower court to render its judgment, because failing to do so prevented the petitioner from pursuing an appeal..." > go to: https://nevadastatepersonnelwatch.wordpress.com/tag/ty-robben / > NEVADA STATE PERSONELL WATCH: THE TRUTH FROM THE LAND OF LEGAL HOOKERS AND GAMBLING...
"Our Constitution intended that only elected lawmakers be permitted to create law. Yet judges create their own law in the judicial system based on their own opinions and rulings. It’s called case law, and it is churned out daily through the rulings of judges. When a judge hands down a ruling and that ruling survives appeal with the next tier of judges, it then becomes case law, or legal precedent. This now happens so consistently that we’ve become more subject to the case rulings of judges rather than to laws made by the lawmaking bodies outlined in our Constitution.
This case-law system is a constitutional nightmare because it continuously modifies constitutional intent. For lawyers, however, it creates endless business opportunities. That’s because case law is technically complicated and requires a lawyer’s expertise to guide and move you through the system. The judicial system may begin with enacted laws, but the variations that result from a judge’s application of case law all too often change the ultimate meaning..."
QUESTION: If the decisions of various individual judges supposedly create "case law"; why was such attention brought to the duck massacre in Campbell, California a few years back -- while no attention has been paid to the plight of the ducks in Johns' neighborhood? Including Precious cat and/or Missy cat; with all of the latest attention on a San Jose, California cat killer who is the son of a police Officer; what about Jake Paolinetti? And why did it take Officers Fuji and Gantt two months to respond? What is the statute of limitations for case law?
GO TO: OUTLAW DUCK FEEDER? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/outlaw-duck-feeder.html + FRIENDLY DISSUASIVE WITNESS TAMPERING? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/03/friendly-dissuasive-witness-tampering.html + CAMPBELL / Duck massacre caught on videotape / Suspect in car wash mayhem has bounty on his head @ http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/CAMPBELL-Duck-massacre-caught-on-videotape-2616973.php + San Jose: Eleven more animal cruelty charges filed against accused cat killer @ http://www.mercurynews.com/san-jose-neighborhoods/ci_30124504/san-jose-eleven-more-animal-cruelty-charges-filed + JAKE PAOLINETTI: POLICE-SANCTIONED CAT KILLER ALLOWED TO ESCAPE JUSTICE? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/jake-paolinetti-police-sanctioned-cat.html + REST IN PEACE MISSY CAT / 25 DEC 2015 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/12/rest-in-peace-missy-cat-25-dec-2015.html
GO TO: OUTLAW DUCK FEEDER? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/06/outlaw-duck-feeder.html + FRIENDLY DISSUASIVE WITNESS TAMPERING? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/03/friendly-dissuasive-witness-tampering.html + CAMPBELL / Duck massacre caught on videotape / Suspect in car wash mayhem has bounty on his head @ http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/CAMPBELL-Duck-massacre-caught-on-videotape-2616973.php + San Jose: Eleven more animal cruelty charges filed against accused cat killer @ http://www.mercurynews.com/san-jose-neighborhoods/ci_30124504/san-jose-eleven-more-animal-cruelty-charges-filed + JAKE PAOLINETTI: POLICE-SANCTIONED CAT KILLER ALLOWED TO ESCAPE JUSTICE? @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/jake-paolinetti-police-sanctioned-cat.html + REST IN PEACE MISSY CAT / 25 DEC 2015 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/12/rest-in-peace-missy-cat-25-dec-2015.html
"When a lawyer puts on a robe and takes the bench, he or she is called a judge. But in reality, when judges look down from the bench they are lawyers looking upon fellow members of their fraternity. In any other area of the free-enterprise system, this would be seen as a conflict of interest. When a lawyer takes an oath as a judge, it merely enhances the ruling class of lawyers and judges. First of all, in Maricopa and Pima counties, judges are not elected but nominated by committees of lawyers, along with concerned citizens. How can they be expected not to be beholden to those who elevated them to the bench? When they leave the bench, many return to large and successful law firms that leverage their names and relationships..."
"The concept of “time” has been converted into enormous revenue for lawyers. The profession has adopted elaborate systems where clients are billed for a lawyer’s time in six-minute increments. The paralegal profession is another brainchild of the fraternity, created as an additional tracking and revenue center. High powered firms have departmentalized their services into separate profit centers for probate and trusts, trial, commercial, and so forth..."
"Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system’s process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them. The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed..."
"The sullying of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer-driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served. Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low-to-middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America. What would our Founding Fathers think?
This devolution of lawmaking by the judiciary has been subtle, taking place incrementally over decades. But today, it’s engrained in our legal system, and few even question it. But the result is clear. Individuals can no longer participate in the legal system..."
“The once honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom-line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.” > go to: http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/03/13/retired-arizona-judge-reveals-corruption-in-legal-system/
(A lawyer from Tuscon, Arizona, John Fitzgerald Molloy (b. 1917) was elected to the Superior Court bench where he served for seven years as both a juvenile court and trial bench judge. He subsequently was elected to the Court of Appeals where he authored over 300 appellate opinions, including the final Miranda decision for the Arizona Supreme Court. During that period, he also served as president of the Arizona Judge’s Association. After 12 years, Molloy returned to private practice to become president of the largest law firm in southern Arizona. His book has received widespread praise for its candor and disquieting truths...)
"Dr. Richard Fine’s Experience with Corrupt Judges in California: I had the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Fine at the end of 2015. He was the first attorney to challenge the system of judicial corruption in California and the first to expose it to public view. He told me how the judges conspired to attack him and bring him down once he started to reveal the corruption. Los Angeles judges denied him the payment of fees for work he had done. They imprisoned him for 18 months. They took his law license. Even after it was proven that corruption did in fact exist, and he did nothing wrong by exposing it, the California Supreme Court still refused to restore his license..." > go to: http://www.citizensdemandingjustice.org/2016/01/medical-kidnap-american-judicial-system.html + SEE ALSO: Who is Trying to Silence Filmmaker and Judicial Watchdog Bill Windsor, Currently Held in County Jail? @ http://medicalkidnap.com/2015/03/16/who-is-trying-to-silence-filmmaker-and-judicial-watchdog-bill-windsor-currently-held-in-county-jail/
NOTE: WHATEVER WAY YOUR ARBITRARY WIND BLOWS; IS THAT IT JUDGE BREYER? EITHER WAY; JOHNS' RECORDED EVIDENCE IS NOW CURRENTLY BEING PROCESSED BY THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION; THE MOST IMPORTANT COURT OF ALL...
SEE ALSO: NSA SURVEILLANCE MALFEASANCE + 18 U.S. CODE § 245 - FEDERALLY PROTECTED ACTIVITIES + 18 U.S. CODE § 1512 - TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS; VICTIM OR INFORMANT ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/08/nsa-surveillance-malfeasance-18-us-code.html + SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PRESIDING JUDGE ROSE JONES PICHON @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/santa-clara-county-superior-court.html + DOCUMENT SUBMITTED TO SUPERIOR COURT COMMISSIONER LISA STEINGART ON 18 OCT 2013 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/document-submitted-to-superior-court.html + JUDGE LOUIS AMADEO JUNIOR @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/02/judge-louis-amadeo-junior.html + OTHER RELATED LINKS: LRE RESEARCH @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/01/lre-research.html + 9/11 JUDGES AND THE WOLF PACK MENTALITY @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/02/9-11-judges-and-wolf-pack-mentality.html + CHIEF CIA ASSET REVEALS 911 TRUTHS @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/chief-cia-asset-reveals-911-truths.html + REVEALED: HOW THE FBI COORDINATED THE CRACKDOWN ON OCCUPY @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/revealed-how-fbi-coordinated-crackdown.html + FEDERAL X-OFFICER GABBY SEAGRAVE AND THE 10 MOST CROOKED THINGS THE FBI HAS EVER DONE @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/federal-x-officer-gabby-seagrave-and-10.html + THE FBI: ACTION FOR NEGLECT TO PREVENT? @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-fbi-action-for-neglect-to-prevent.html
<><><>
UPDATE: 8 AUG 2016 / TIMELINE: 1) 1 AUG 2016: Judge bars secret FBI recordings in alleged bid-rigging plot @ http://www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Judge-bars-secret-FBI-recordings-in-alleged-9015186.php; 2) 1 AUG 2016: John calls the Santa Clara County Bar Association (SCCBA) regarding his need for legal assistance (note: SCCBA has not returned Johns' call); 3) 2 AUG 2016: John creates new Addendum Blog 2 post titled "SECRET FBI RECORDINGS ETC" @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/08/secret-fbi-recordings-etc.html; 4) 5 AUG 2016: FBI director James Comey in San Francisco addressing the American Bar Association at the Moscone Center > Police misconduct focus of FBI Director James Comey's speech in San Francisco @ http://abc7news.com/news/police-misconduct-focus-of-fbi-directors-speech-in-sf/1459309/ > Note: After September 11, 2001 the FBI admitted to actively destabilizing activists for 25 years prior to the 9-11 attacks; and the USA Patriot Act later turned this dirty little secret into law. (ACLU)
A few years ago John mentioned this possible scenario to his alleged CIA buddy; as mass NSA surveillance allows law enforcement to pre-empt internal investigations -- therefore in a very large sense allowing "the fox to guard the hen house" so to speak. For instance; on August 4th, 2015 John filed his first Amended Complaint with the Superior Court of California; County of Santa Clara -- Sunnyvale Courthouse (Note: John never received the required reciprocal documentation from this court; and perhaps due to this seemingly intentional oversight -- the ex-presiding Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge in charge was later replaced by Judge Rose Pichon). After John turned onto the El Camino Real from Henderson Avenue and waited at the stop light at Poplar Avenue heading towards downtown Sunnyvale; a Sunnyvale D.P.S. vehicle then turned onto El Camino Real from Poplar WITH HIS LIGHTS FLASHING (!?!) traveling in front (!?!) of John's vehicle all the way up to Wolfe Road. John was either getting an official escort to the Sunnyvale City Clerks' office and/or this was a lame attempt at intimidating and/or coercing John; who suspects keystroke monitors were perhaps being utilized to track Johns' movements and progress on the Amended Complaint. Adding to this; a cadre of Sunnyvale Police Officers and/or Firemen were waiting in front of the Sunnyvale City Clerks' office in a highly unsuccessful intimidation attempt.
THE SOLUTION? To end this questionable government-sanctioned variety of pervasive class-based discrimination and/or intimidation; a permanent government-subsidized program providing free legal counsel instructing participants self-representation without the assistance of financially prohibitive lawyers and/or attorneys etc would be in order. Adding to this; usage of The Martus System for certain Plaintiffs; Defendants and/or Witnesses and/or Whistle blowers etc could provide an extra layer of protection from intimidation and/or coercion and/or any other legal and/or illegal retaliation involved without the help of a lawyer and/or attorney. > go to: THE MARTUS SYSTEM @ https://www.martus.org/
15
SEP 2016: DRYER SELFIE UPDATE / THE DAY AFTER JOHN POSTED THIS
"WEINER-ESQUE" SELFIE TO FACEBOOK SHOWING JOHNS' SMART PHONE CAMERA
COVERED UP WITH TAPE; FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY SPOKE ABOUT COVERING UP
HIS WEB CAMERA WITH TAPE > GO TO: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/295933-fbi-director-cover-up-your-webcam
<><><>
THE SOLUTION? To end this questionable government-sanctioned variety of pervasive class-based discrimination and/or intimidation; a permanent government-subsidized program providing free legal counsel instructing participants self-representation without the assistance of financially prohibitive lawyers and/or attorneys etc would be in order. Adding to this; usage of The Martus System for certain Plaintiffs; Defendants and/or Witnesses and/or Whistle blowers etc could provide an extra layer of protection from intimidation and/or coercion and/or any other legal and/or illegal retaliation involved without the help of a lawyer and/or attorney. > go to: THE MARTUS SYSTEM @ https://www.martus.org/
NOTE: One night John went to his local 7-11 and started talking to the clerk. The 7-11 clerk of middle eastern descent was talking to a tall middle eastern looking man wearing a tuxedo with a bow tie. John asked an offhand question to the 7-11 clerk: "Is he an FBI agent?" (regarding the man in the tuxedo) to which the 7-11 clerk responded; "Oh yeh; he's the big cheese!" causing the suspected FBI agent to make a face as if the clerk needed to shut up. Question: why was an alleged head FBI agent sitting at the 7-11 in Johns' neighborhood for so long; a 7-11 where likroper.com stickers were placed on the pay phone; leading to the likroper.com web site that was and/or is literally LOADED with information about the harassment/stalking/menacing/vandalism john was experiencing at the time; without any affirmative action being taken? Adding to this; why did the FBI not respond to John after John made numerous calls regarding public corruption that John was experiencing at the time?
FBI RESPONSE: Comey Asks Justice Dept. to Reject Trump’s Wiretapping Claim @
ReplyDeletehttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/us/politics/trump-seeks-inquiry-into-allegations-that-obama-tapped-his-phones.html?_r=0
getting a little nervous there comey?
ReplyDelete