STUDY FINDS WITHOUT ELECTION FRAUD SANDERS WOULD HAVE WON BY A LANDSLIDE

VERMONT SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS

THE FOLLOWING IS FROM THE LAST PAGE OF THE ENTIRE REPORT:

A. CONCLUSIONS 

We have aimed to provide an overview of the evidence for various types of fraud and targeted voter suppression impacting the outcomes of the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. After covering the legal background and the history of Election Justice USA’s legal actions, our best efforts to combat election fraud and voter suppression, we gave a thorough treatment of: 

1) Targeted voter suppression

2) Registration tampering

3) Illegal voter purges

4) Exit polling discrepancies

5) Evidence for voting machine tampering

6) The security (or lack thereof) of various voting machine types 

Finally, we gave a date-by-date, state-by-state overview of each of these fraud or suppression types at work throughout the course of the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. Based on this work, Election Justice USA has established an upper estimate of 184 pledged delegates lost by Senator Bernie Sanders as a consequence of specific irregularities and instances of fraud. Adding these delegates to Senator Sanders’ pledged delegate total and subtracting the same number from Hillary Clinton’s total would more than erase the 359 pledged delegate gap between the two candidates. EJUSA established the upper estimate through exit polling data, statistical analysis by precinct size, and attention to the details of Democratic proportional awarding of national delegates. Even small changes in vote shares in critical states like Massachusetts and New York could have substantially changed the media narrative surrounding the primaries in ways that would likely have had far reaching consequences for Senator Sanders’ campaign. 

B. RECOMMENDATIONS
 
We conclude by calling for decertification of the 2016 Democratic primary results in every state in which we have established a reasonable doubt as to the accuracy of the vote tally.

GO TO: ELECTION JUSTICE USA FINDS THAT WITHOUT ELECTION FRAUD SANDERS WOULD HAVE WON BY A LANDSLIDE @ http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/7/29/1554022/-Election-Justice-USA-Study-Finds-that-Without-Election-Fraud-Sanders-Would-Have-Won-by-Landslide + SEE ALSO: VIOLATION OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 + RETALIATION AGAINST A WHISTLE BLOWER ETC (CONTINUED) 5 @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/violation-of-voting-rights-act-of-1965.html

NOTE: John has not voted in about 5 years and was about to vote once again for Bernie Sanders in the upcoming Novemeber 2016 election -- and John was also going to vote for California Proposition 64, Marijuana Legalization (2016) -- but since there was targeted voter suppression; registration tampering; illegal voter purges; exit polling discrepancies; evidence for voting machine tampering; and insecure voting machines etc John will not be voting again any time soon.