YOUTUBE.COM: PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION + THE SUNNYVALE POLICE ATTEMPT TO CHANGE A REPORTERS' STORY?

OFFICER ODLE -- Back in early October 2011; a Sunnyvale D.P.S. Officer named "Odle" visited John's house early one morning. Officer Odle said John's videos @ http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY were the subject of a morning police briefing (Note: President Obama was in town; so local government was hastily trying to appear like they were actually doing their jobs for once). John spoke to Officer Odle about the events which had transpired over the last few years; and Officer Odle ended up giving a ticket to the vehicle seen in the photo below instead of focusing on the Rebholtz family situation; where further non-coincidental stalking and/or harassment etc of John was and/or still is originating from to this day. 

GO TO: INCIDENT ON 8 JUNE 2016 / GANG ACTIVITY; CONSPIRACY; NON-COINCIDENTAL CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL HARASSMENT AND/OR STALKING; DISTURBING THE PEACE; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; WITNESS INTIMIDATION ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/06/incident-on-8-june-2016-gang-activity.html + NEW TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES NEEDED NOW! @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/11/new-traffic-calming-measures-needed-now.html

As it turns out; Officer Odle had been experiencing the same kind of harassment as John; but while Officer Odle seemed truly concerned about John's situation; he seemed unaware of the illegality of this kind of behavior. Despite Officer Odle's valiant actions; the ticket given to the owner of the 4x4 truck was a mere bandaid to help cover up a gaping 5 year old wound. While one criminal was caught; all the others still run free...

Question: Officer Odle promised to go to the Paolinetti's house and talk to Jake Paolinetti's father, did Officer Odle ever do this? > Photo of the vehicle Officer Odle ticketed (below)

THIS 4x4 TRUCK WAS NOT STREET LEGAL

THE SUNNYVALE POLICE ATTEMPTED TO CHANGE A REPORTERS' STORY? The truth is; the Sunnyvale police actually sent Officer Odle to nicely coerce John into changing one of his you tube video stories after Johns' you tube site had been featured at the Sunnyvale police briefing that same morning. John originally wrote "POLICE-SPONSORED STALKING AND HARASSMENT" on top of some of the you tube videos @ http://youtube.com/LREVIDEOGRAPHY causing Officer Odle to ask John if he would change the title to take out the police-sponsored reference; violating Johns' First Amendment rights etc in the process. 

After so many years of John experiencing illegal stalking and abuse; with a Police Officers' son (Officer Don Paolinetti and/or Jake Paolinetti) using  his Fathers' vehicle to harass and stalk John etc; combined with the negligence of local police departments (by default) the Sunnyvale DPS is now in a very large sense responsible for the nightmare John has experienced for so many years > AND WHILE ONE REPORTER MAY BE BACKING DOWN (see link below) JOHN IS CLEARLY NOT. In a very large sense; John  was fooled by Officer Odle into thinking Officer Odle actually cared about Johns' situation; when all he really wanted John to do was change the title of his you tube video. SEE RELATED STORY @ http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/local-govt-politics/reporter-wont-sue-berkeley-police-chief/nLQZH/

DELETED VIDEO IN QUESTION: POLICE-SANCTIONED GANG ACTIVITY (CONTINUED) @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnK39H0mrVo > NOTE: After the various aforementioned XYZ cover ups; the stalking and harassment and menacing of John continued unabated; and the aforementioned video HAS BEEN DELETED to destroy evidence and continue the cover up. 

Thousands of harmless karaoke videos @ https://www.youtube.com/user/OASISNIGHTCLUB were also deleted a few years back; disallowing (for instance) old friends of "Doctor Jim" (a now deceased Chiropractor) from watching Doctor Jims' archived karaoke performances; along with countless other stellar performances by Oasis nightclub regulars. If these harmless karaoke videos allegedly "violated community standards"; then why did the prison yard-like behavior John experienced over the last decade not "violate community standards" as well?

John once received correspondence from Van Morrison's record company; and after a bit of back and forth between parties; the publishing company agreed that if a copyright credit reference was added to any given song ("with kind permission" etc) then it was ok to perform and post Van Morrison songs on youtube.com. But in the end all this accomplished was an avoidance of Van Morrison karaoke songs; which is clearly not in the interest of the artist.

OTHER ILLEGALLY DELETED YOU TUBE VIDEOS:

EXCERPT FROM CIVILRIGHTS1.doc / 25 apr 2011: MENTAL ILLNESS | HATE CRIMES | CRIMINAL THREATS | @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZuOygtSY6A&list=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug

25 APRIL 2011: Jake Paolinetti and friends drive by John's house one afternoon menacing, stalking and harassing John at his residence (non-coincidental); doing exactly what they did for a number of years at night. Jake can be heard yelling "You motherfucking faggot" etc while John is clearly heterosexual. It is illegal to harass and menace people based upon their suspected sexual preference. GO TO: http://likroper.com/P1000593.MOV

This particular part of the case arose from an unwelcome visit by Jake Paolinetti. During the previous year Jake had made criminal threats towards John; saying among other things that he was "going to crush his skull". About one year later after the April 2011 encounter; Jake approached John's place of residence one night after driving by earlier that day menacing and making criminal threats towards John. Jake's false statements regarding his criminal trespass on John's property in April 2011 were enough to arrest Jake under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution; but the responding Sunnyvale DPS Officer on the scene that night refused to review the video evidence of Jake's criminal threats made towards John on that night in April of 2011; therefore ignoring exculpatory evidence in the process and ultimately placing himself in "dereliction of duty" by attempting to "guide the case." 

REST IN PEACE PRECIOUS CAT

On December 3rd, 2011; John's beloved cat Precious was found dead on the street in front of his house. The last time John saw Precious was at about 5:30 am on that very same morning; when John said: "I love you, Precious" then went to sleep. After waking up at about 10:30 am the very same day; Johns' neighbors found Precious dead in the street; and came over to tell John what happened. While the death of Precious appeared to be an accident; John suspects that it was made to LOOK like an accident when it very likely was not.

If you click on this link: > http://likroper.com/dog1.jpg > you will see a dead dog who was apparently killed the same barbaric way as Precious during the recent Romanian dog slaughter (warning: contains graphic imagery). Do you notice blood around the dogs' body? There was absolutely NO blood at the scene of the crime where Precious was found dead; only clear fluid from her head after being smashed in the street. (no photos were taken; but several witnesses saw her body). The evidence was suspicious and suggested foul play was somehow involved.

About one month later after the death of Precious;
John found this email from Jake Paolinetti in his email inbox:

--- On Sat, 12/10/11, Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Jake Paolinetti <tjpaolinetti@yahoo.com> Subject: videos To: "likroper@yahoo.com" <likroper@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, December 10, 2011, 2:18 PM

"Hi this is Jake Paolinetti, I am sorry about all the harassing and headaches I have caused you in the past and wanted to let you know I am done with it all and won't be happening anymore.  I was also wondering if you could take down the videos of me?  I would really appreciate it, because that person in those videos isn't me. Thank you, Jake..."

This email not only strongly suggests that Jake Paolinetti is not only very likely responsible for the death of Precious; but it also shows that deleting the videos in question only gave this little criminal his way; helping to cover up his criminal activities from the past. > SEE ALSO: REST IN PEACE, PRECIOUS @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/rest-in-peace-precious.html

QUESTION: Why is the SCCDAs' office lately speaking about incarcerating a cat killer for up to 16 years; while alleged cat killer and/or video-convicted human stalker and harasser Jake Paolinetti runs free? > GO TO: Alleged San Jose Cat Killer Now Faces 21 Felony Counts of Animal Cruelty @ http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Alleged-San-Jose-Cat-Killer-Now-Faces-21-Felony-Counts-of-Animal-Cruelty-386708791.html

<><><>

LEGAL NOTE: Jake Paolinetti is clearly NOT entitled to the qualified immunity available to government officials; as the legal principle to bar Jakes' illegal and threatening conduct is clearly pre-established. Also; no court has ever recognized a First Amendment right for ANY citizen to be free from retaliatory non-arrest with probable cause; nor was such a right otherwise clearly established at the time of Jakes' non-arrest. 

And while it has been pre-established that government officials may not be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution; the question remains whether government officials CAN be sued under the First Amendment for retaliatory non-prosecutions where there was probable cause to pursue prosecution. 

Countless hours were spent creating and putting together the deleted youtube.com videos in question; and no due process was used in deleting them -- therefore violating the United States Constitution and/or Johns' rights in the process.

DUE PROCESS CLAUSE: The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution each contain a due process clause. Due process deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the Government outside the sanction of law. The Supreme Court of the United States interprets the clauses more broadly because these clauses provide four protections: procedural due process (in civil and criminal proceedings), substantive due process, a prohibition against vague laws, and as the vehicle for the incorporation of the Bill of Rights. Due process ensures the rights and equality of all citizens. > GO TO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_Process_Clause

SEE ALSO: WITNESS INTIMIDATION AND/OR DISSUADING A WITNESS ETC: CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE § 136.1 @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/09/witness-intimidation-andor-dissuading.htm + DO NOT SEE: INCIDENT ON 25 APRIL 2010 / JAKE PAOLINETTI: CONSPIRACY AND HATE CRIMES @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/jake-paolinetti-conspiracy-and-hate.html > INSTEAD GO TO: http://likroper.com/11JUL2010_220AM.avi + STALKING | HARASSMENT ETC @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZuOygtSY6Alist=UU13_WfEgp0MBd6w_RqN1oug&index=3&feature=plcp + VANDALISM BY JAKE PAOLINETTI AND FRIENDS? (THE REBHOLTZ BROTHERS ETC?) @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evj15rULEsU > Note: all deleted videos have been securely backed up to a secret remote location that will not be disclosed to the public; and will be later posted permanently elsewhere at a secure online location.

 

It is not known when the videos in question were deleted; but it seems this negligent act of evidence destruction by youtube.com has only emboldened these young criminals; encouraging them to continue their conspiratorial, non-coincidental campaign of harassment and stalking. / CLICK HERE > INCIDENT ON 8 JUNE 2016 / GANG ACTIVITY; CONSPIRACY; NON-COINCIDENTAL CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL HARASSMENT AND/OR STALKING; DISTURBING THE PEACE; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; WITNESS INTIMIDATION ETC

  7CEC958 LAYING IN WAIT
16 JULY 2016

RELATED STORY: NEXTDOOR.COM: PRIVATE BUSINESS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION / DISCRIMINATION ETC @ http://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/nextdoorcom-private-business-of-public.html + LRE UPDATE: NIGHT ATTACK / 6 AUG 2010 12:20 AM @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5HY4EyWuGY

"UPDATE / 9 January 2015: John was out exercising on Friday 8 Jan 2015 when he came upon a lady who is an old neighborhood friend. The lady (who will remain anonymous for now unless later needed) is the mother of someone John went to school with at Laurelwood Elementary School many years ago. In conversation; the subject of the Paolinetti family came up (this particular lady lives near the Paolinetti family) and she claimed that many of the neighbors who live adjacent to the old Paolinetti family house were exposed to a living hell of parties and noise coming from the Paolinetti house. One time an arrow allegedly came flying over the fence. "A gang" is how the lady described them (similar to Johns' description); "very good looking kids who you would not expect to do this kind of thing" she also added. She said that Mister Paolinetti was not a regular cop; but instead a cop "who did paperwork for the other cops" adding that "cops did not want to get Mister Paolinetti in trouble" for some reason unknown; as if they feared Mister Paolinetti or something. The Paolinetti moved out of their house in February 2014..."

> EXCERPT FROM: NEW TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES NEEDED NOW! @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/11/new-traffic-calming-measures-needed-now.html

SEE ALSO: A conversation between John and neighbor Steve Henson [who is a good friend of Officer Don Paolinetti] discussing some of the events in question can be heard @ http://likroper.com/Voice0006.amr > Note: This recording has been submitted to the California State Attorney General Kamala Harris. GO TO: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR DOMESTIC TERRORISM AND/OR FELONY STALKING AND/OR UNCIVIL HARASSMENT (CONTINUED) @ http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/08/obstruction-of-justice-andor-domestic.html

NOTE: DON'T FEAR DONALD TRUMP FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE ONLINE CENSORSHIP WHEN IT IS OBVIOUSLY ALREADY HAPPENING HERE IN AMERICA AND/OR ABROAD: (excerpts from The Daily Kos) I want to remind people of Donald Trump's words and what it means in the larger context of what is at stake in this election. This is from December of last year:  

"We're losing a lot of people because of the Internet and we have to do something. We have to go see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening. We have to talk to them, maybe in certain areas closing that Internet up in some way. Somebody will say, 'oh, freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people…we've got to maybe do something with the Internet because they are recruiting by the thousands, they are leaving our country and then when they come back, we take them back..."

What Donald Trump is saying here is that he would be willing to use Federal power to order the private companies that own and control most of the basic infrastructure to curb free speech in the name of security. He is being very explicit here about what he believes are the scope of the power of presidency, which is essentially limitless. This is not unusual in right wing populist circles, but I want to take a few moments to place it in a broader context... 

GO TO: DONALD TRUMP SAID HE WOULD 'CLOSE THE INTERNET' @ http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/7/22/1550852/-Donald-Trump-said-he-would-close-the-Internet
 

SEE ALSO: The world may never know what happened in the videos Korryn Gaines posted to her Facebook page before she was shot and killed by Maryland police. It may never get to read the questions more than 2,200 Reddit users would have asked of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump during a Q&A session on the site. That’s because in both cases, the social-media sites blocked accounts or removed content, prompting complaints of censorship. Experts say this is a misnomer: There is no such thing as free speech on sites owned by private companies, and censorship just might be the price of admission. > GO TO: http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/Blocked-and-banned-by-social-media-When-is-it-9193998.php 

But! if that is what supposed "experts" actually think about free speech; then those supposed "experts" can basically go fuck themselves all the way to Hell and stay there indefinitely; as the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was argued for roughly 14 YEARS before final ratification; and social media companies like Facebook.com and Nextdoor.com etc are basically being allowed by the courts to be in violation of the First Amendment for asking people to agree to unconstitutional user agreements to begin with (in other words; CENSORSHIP) in their private businesses of public accommodation. (for instance; a bar and a website are essentially the same; as they are both private businessess of public accommodation -- therefore if you are free to speak in a bar; then you should in theory be equally free to speak online as well; as dissent is not a right granted only to Supreme Court justices; it is a right of all free people.

NOTE: "I've always felt corporations here in the Silicon Valley often violate the rights of workers due to unconstitutional corporate practices and/or low pay scales etc (a form of class-based discrimination). But now as of late these rights violations have spilled over onto the world wide web; where people all over the world who seek freedom are now being silenced online for having unpopular messages -- making federal and state statutes in a sense less important than online user agreements and therefore watering-down the concept of liberty and justice for all..." -- Anonymous > QUESTION: Since when it is not ok to violate youtubes' (often unconstitutional) terms of service; but ok to violate federal and/or state statutes and/or constitutional amendments?

Deanna St.Croix of Toronto, ON, Canada wrote: "Facebook removed and censored the shared post about the DAPL. It was posted two days ago. Yesterday I noticed where the post used to be there was a facebook notice that they had removed the posting. Has anyone else had this happening to them? Why the fuck is FB censoring for big oil?..."

SEE ALSO: GOOGLE CENSORSHIP @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2017/10/google-censorship.html 

11 May 2018 / UPDATE: Since writing this Google/You Tube has deleted yet another important video called "The Revolving Door of Violent Stalking and Harassment"; but I recorded a video of that video straight from my computer screen and downloaded it into my web site > GO TO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @
http://likroper.com/TRDOVSAH3.wmv

Note: It doesn't matter whether it is China and/or Russia and/or America (etc); every country comes up with their own unique lame excuses to violate the rights of their users...