SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA (DTS) CASE # B2201070 + FAMILY COURT DIVISION CASE # 22EA000051 -- REQUESTING LEAVE TO PRESENT A LATE CLAIM / BOARD OF SUPERVISORS / BOS #24-284
 |
| SECRET WITNESS SWEETIE PIE |
This is regarding a claim submitted by Plaintiff John Andrew Clefstad:
"The courts should overrule all explicit gendered biases and or at least clarify statutory silence regarding necessary powers and protections granted elsewhere to females; and or inherently, axiomatically discriminatory misinterpreted and or misrepresented constitutional rights where males are axiomatically guaranteed equal protections; constituting overarching ambiguity requiring equal deference and or equal protections and or equal justice under law to both sexes..." -- "Similarly and collectively: courts should essentially overrule all explicit socioeconomic and or gendered and or race-based discriminations across the board without hesitation due to the pluralistic natures of various individual judiciary leanings..."
"Bagley versus Sunnyvale proved low-income white males are the most discriminated against in this particular Santa Clara County region; with a discovery process conducted by an African-American lawyer; therefore due to jurisdictional variations and multicultural socioeconomic monocultural conflations needing universal protections; all forms of discrimination must be eliminated..."
GO TO: ADDENDUMBLOG 2 @
https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: ESTABLISHING FACTUAL INNOCENCE: @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2023/05/establishing-factual-innocence.html
In the last roughly 30 years a computer revolution has occurred here in Silicon Valley; therefore at some point in time this amazing new technology should be officially acknowledged and embraced for unfettered usage in court proceedings to honor self-executing statutory constitutional free speech rights. Plaintiff John is also a victim of class-based discrimination on the part of the County of Santa Clara not only through denial of self-executing First Amendment rights; but also denial of the inability to freely express himself along with countless other pro se defendants denied basic unalienable free speech rights for usage in their own defense. (Money should not equal justice) Adding to this Plaintiff John's was denied the option to recuse himself from Commissioner Johnson's courtroom for a Superior Court judge required within Superior Court proceedings. No required/promised mediator was available at this closed door hearing either. Therefore amounting not only to class-based bias against low-income defendants; but also discrimination and or bias against men and or women depending upon circumstances...
STATEMENT FROM PLAINTIFF JOHN: "Defendant Kris Davy attacked Plaintiff John on a Sunday night back in April 2022; causing Plaintiff John to call the Sunnyvale DPS non-emergency line. A female DPS employee answered John's frantic call in the filing room as the DPS desk officer was gone at the time. This unnamed Sunnyvale DPS employee was concerned for Plaintiff John's safety; asking for a wellness check of Defendant Davy who had a black eye from falling over a cement block and breaking her glasses the day before. Defendant Davy can be heard on this recorded phone call (after initially fleeing the scene in fear of DPS) blaming Plaintiff John for Defendant Davy's self-inflicted injurious state.
 |
| PRIOR KNOWLEDGE TEXT FROM PLAINTIFF JOHN TO DEFENDANT DAVY REGARDING DEFENDANT DAVY'S UNRESTRAINED VIOLENT TENDENCIES / 12 APRIL 2022 |
Flight risk Defendant Davy then fled to her home in Seattle the very next day out of fear of arrest and prosecution by Sunnyvale DPS who in the end had absolutely zero intention of arresting Defendant Davy due to deeply embedded gendered bias at the Santa Clara County District Attorney's office..."
ADDING BACKDATED PERSPECTIVE: This lawsuit drafted by Plaintiff John was filed at the City of Sunnyvale City Clerk’s office back in 2015; but Plaintiff John never heard back from the City of Sunnyvale as this legal complaint was likely officially disappeared. Content of aforementioned lawsuit interestingly still applies to the current situation; with exponentially more defendants
GO TO: http://likroper.com/CITYOFSUNNYVALE4.wpd
http://likroper.com/CITYOFSANTACLARA4.wpd
DEFENDANT LIST: “Each defendant has knowingly and/or perhaps unknowingly participated in the operation and management of the Enterprise, and has committed numerous acts to maintain and expand the Enterprise.
In order to avoid discovery of their fraudulent conduct and the possibility that they might be called to account for their conduct, defendants engaged in a widespread scheme to frustrate public scrutiny by making false and deceptive statements and by concealing documents etc that they knew would have exposed their public campaign of deceit. This scheme included making false and deceptive statements to the public etc...
Defendants' tortious and unlawful course of conduct has caused plaintiff to suffer dangerous diseases and injuries. As a consequence of defendants' tortious and unlawful conduct, plaintiff has depleted all life insurance monies left to plaintiff by plaintiffs’ deceased brother and lost gainful employment. The effect of defendants' fraudulent scheme and wrongful conduct continues to this day; as defendants are continuing their unlawful and tortious conduct; and, unless restrained by this Court, defendants are likely to continue their unlawful activities into the future..."
Various mis steps were taken by the County of Santa Clara regarding the illegal eviction of Plaintiff John Andrew Clefstad; as well as the City of Sunnyvale and/or Sunnyvale DPS:
1) No required 3 day notice were given to Plaintiff by Santa Clara County sheriffs reacting to a perjurious codified document submitted by Defendants Kris Davy and Sandy Tabbada; 1a) Responding county sheriffs forgot to remind overwhelmed medically compromised Plaintiff John to bring the restraining order with him 18 May 2022 (restraining order Defendant Davy should have gotten for attacking Plaintiff John April 10 2022); 1b) Causing Plaintiff John to return to his residence of 53 years to not only get said restraining order; but also shoes he would desperately need and/or to lock his bedroom door to keep out his nosey thieving sister who has been stealing Plaintiff John 's constitutionally protected property for over a decade now; so if the people who stole Plaintiff John's vehicle are being held responsible for this misallocation; Defendant Davy needs to be held accountable too; as well as Defendant Tabbada for repeatedly tampering with Plaintiff John's private property like a petulant child -- causing a very clear case of Defendant Davy and/or employee Defendant Tabbada disrupting and occupying Plaintiff John's personal private space while tampering with Plaintiff John's private property, making Plaintiff John feel more threatened and less safe than he already was with Defendant Davy's constant unrestrained harassment and torture over at very least a decade of time; 1c) all similar evictions after this point should include at least 15 minutes as supposed to 5 minutes; as well as 3 days required notice; including a list of items defendants may need like shoes etc (Plaintiff John was laughably charged with felony theft for taking his own shoes out of his own house after this hostile Nazi-inspired sneak attack flag desecrating takeover) clothing and much needed medical supplies Plaintiff John was denied from gathering after a year of illness overseen by Sunnyvale DPS who showed absolutely zero compassion for Plaintiff John's serious medical condition -- Question: Is this all part of Covered CA?); 1ca) County sheriffs also desecrated a flag hanging in front of Plaintiff John's bedroom door; not only breaking the law but also showing zero disrespect for the good values this country was founded upon; 1cb) Cannabis plants Plaintiff John legally grew were illegally confiscated and destroyed by these same county sheriffs; violating Plaintiff John's voting rights since the color of law cannot be used to intimidate or coerce voters before a voter; AND/OR 20+ YEARS AFTER; especially after the State of CA promised no Proposition 215 patients would be adversely disaffected by the passage of Proposition 64: (https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2019/08/ca-proposition-215-and-proposition-64.html); SEE ATTACHMENTS A&B&C BELOW; 1d) Plaintiff John recently expressed concern about his remaining property at the house he lived at for 53 years without incident; wanting some items to sell and make money and others that Plaintiff John needed; 1e) Culminating in the rest of John's property being maliciously sent to a storage unit with Defendant Davy threatening to send it all to South San Francisco if plaintiff John did not react quickly and follow her demands;
(Plaintiff John was also wrongfully assigned to Judge Manley’s Department 61 Mental Health Court against his will (defaming Plaintiff John in the process) when Plaintiff John should have been assigned to Department 61 Medical Court even though Defendant Davy actually belonged in Manley’s Mental Health Court due to her mental illness.
1f) Violating John's California constitutional right to privacy once again; and despite the fact Plaintiff John has repeatedly requested non-contact from Defendant Davy for at very least the past decade; 1g) Plaintiff John required photos of all property in question that was being sent to this new storage unit so Plaintiff John could pick and choose the most important property; but Defendant Davy declined to send any photos and would not respond to text messages;
2) Burden of proof was on Defendants Davy and Tabbada to prove fraudulent claims; but said Defendants failed to provide any evidence of verbal/written claims submitted through their fancy hearsay evidence submitted by typographically etc deficient lawyer Leila Sockolov;
3) Plaintiff John was viciously attacked by Defendant Davy on Sunday night 10 April 2022 in an out of the blue surprise attack on the way back from the dryer carrying clean clothes; 3a) Plaintiff John was wrongfully charged with family violence that Defendant Davy ultimately committed; 3b) Along with animal abuse after leaving Plaintiff John's beloved cat Molly out to die attempting to deny water to this cat with kidney disease and another at risk kitty;
4) Plaintiff John contacted Sunnyvale DPS at least 4 times about Defendant Davy's attack; every time DPS refused to call Defendant Davy until she was "back in town";
5) Defendant Davy ultimately obstructed justice by contacting county sheriffs to sway them with perjurious fraudulent claims to cover up her abuse culminating in a Nazi-like eviction (SCCDA Rosen promised to eliminate); while attacking police is a felony; BUT POLICE ARE NOT HERE TO PROTECT AND SERVE THEMSELVES; 5a) Forcing Plaintiff John to be illegally removed from his residence of 53 years with 5 minutes notice and/or without required 3 days notice for legal evictions; 5b) Recent testimony from a secret witness strongly suggests John's father Lester is very unhappy with the treatment he is receiving from Defendant Davy who has squandered all of Lester's finances fixing up the house for sale that Lester does not want to sell; telling the secret witness he is miserable under the care of a very manipulative and controlling Defendant Davy; 5b1) But Defendant Davy was never charged with financial elder abuse and/or Defendant Tabbada was never scrutinized by APS for her alleged molestation of Plaintiff John's father; 5b2) While Plaintiff John was charged with elder abuse after saving his father's life during a stroke and taking care of his father for about 6 years afterwards; charges that were later suspended and dropped; 5b3) While CA Governor Gavin Newsom was never charged with elder abuse for being responsible for the mass deaths of seniors citizens during his unconstitutionally conducted lockdown lacking necessary constitutional suspension;
6) Force utilized by Defendant Davy 20 April 2022 was facilitated by Sunnyvale DPS who has refused to protect and serve Plaintiff John for over 20 years now; 6a) And/or the County of Santa Clara who had aforementioned facts about Defendant Davy's violence presented to them in D61 Mental Health Court -- but these facts were ultimately ignored by Judge Manley and court psychologists etc likely due to deeply embedded socioeconomic/gendered bias;
7) After a year long illness combined with a breast cancer condition Plaintiff John suffered from during the Covid pandemic (witnessed by Plaintiff John's Father Lester) Plaintiff John was treated the way a dog cannot be treated during this illegal eviction with force; 7a) In the future all individuals facing possible evictions should not only be given 3 days required notice; but also either be allowed an impartial hearing BEFORE an eviction takes place and/or taken directly to a courtroom and allowed unfettered free speech to defend themselves in court to avoid further future constitutional violations;
8) Adding to this; false claims made by Defendant Davy about Plaintiff John's supposed suicidal state during this most vulnerable time in Plaintiff John's life proved that not only Defendant Davy is guilty of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) but also the County of Santa Clara and /or Sunnyvale DPS who heartlessly pushed this through without taking into consideration the gravity of the situation or the life they put at risk;
9) Plaintiff John had undiagnosed pancreatitis at the time of the illegal eviction which later festered and caused so much pain and discomfort Plaintiff John actually did consider suicide at one point for the first time in his life -- partially due to the heartless way Plaintiff John was mistreated by listed Defendants ~ but mainly due to extreme pancreatic pain;
10) Superior Court Judge Carol Overton was removed from her position shortly after Plaintiff John's bogus restraining order was issued;
11) As well as Sheriff Laurie Smith who was found to have violated law and removed from her position as sheriff around the same time; 11a) Suggesting a pattern or practice of gendered bias and or axiomatically existential misfeasance and or malfeasance;
12) Plaintiff John was also contacted out of the blue by an anonymous source the day of his closed door family court hearing lacking a promised mediator or due process; warning Plaintiff John that Commissioner Johnson's courtroom procedure lacked required due process and/or free speech in general (this source later allegedly experienced retaliation for speaking out to Plaintiff John); 12a) Plaintiff John recently discovered that it is required to offer defendants recusal in the event that a Superior Court judge is not available; whereas Commissioner Eric Johnson is not a Superior Court judge and did not offer Plaintiff John this sensible option; 12b) The Superior Court of California Family Division was recently exposed for discrimination against pro se defendants by laughing at pro se litigants during their annual meeting with lawyers who defended family court clients; 12c) While Plaintiff John is a pro se defendant;
13) Defendant Davy bribed Plaintiff John with $200 the week before this family court hearing;
14) But Commissioner Eric Johnson's lack of due process violated Plaintiff John's self-executing First Amendment rights disallowing Plaintiff John from speaking freely instead focusing on the perjurious narrative;
15) Plaintiff John attempted to have a civil standby conducted by both county sheriffs and Sunnyvale DPS shortly after his illegal eviction with force facilitated by Sunnyvale DPS; 15a) Both entities refused to conduct civil standbys for Plaintiff John; causing many of Plaintiff John's prized possessions to be misallocated and or destroyed; while Commissioner Eric Johnson suggested civil standbys are commonplace events; 15c) Plaintiff John's van was stolen during the summer of 2023 facilitated by supposedly progressive liberal law enforcement policies allowing unrestrained retail and property theft; 15d) causing an axiomatic immeasurable amount of harm to countless individuals who also had their privacy violated when their vehicles were stolen via “progressive” liberal policies protecting criminals while re victimizing victims; 15e) IRS tax records going back 10 years were not transferred by Defendant Davy to Plaintiff John's storage unit causing John inability to respond to IRS notices;
16) Plaintiff John's self-executing First Amendment rights were also egregiously violated: Plaintiff John called caregiver Defendant Sandy Tabbada a "hooker" after Plaintiff John allegedly witnessed Defendant Tabbada molesting John's father Lester (Plaintiff John contacted Adult Protective Services and/or APS about this alleged molestation but APS refused to take any corrective actions about this; and or the fact that John's father Lester and John are both being isolated by Defendants Tabadda and Davy); a1) who have further violated the law and/or Plaintiff John's rights by committing USPS fraud intercepting Plaintiff John's mail sent to his father; b) Plaintiff John was told to be quiet at the county jail to be released sooner by the friendly DPS transport officer; c) Plaintiff John was in a holding cell for felons and asked a question only to be thrown into a cold isolation cell for an unknown amount of time as punishment for exercising his self-executing constitutional rights; right after telling the staff he was a blogger who was going to write about his experiences in county jail doing time for 3 days for violence Defendant Davy committed; d) POS (Person of Service) PDO Gary Goodman silenced Plaintiff John after flashing a piece of paper with his addendum blog address to the judge to add much needed perspective forcing this evidence into play;
e) City of Sunnyvale HR department had to be backed off by a DPS officer for threatening Plaintiff John's free speech rights; POS PDO Gary Goodman not only suggested Defendant Davy's alleged molestation was consensual but also said they were "having a little fun"?!; f) Plaintiff John had his self-executing First Amendment right repeatedly violated in Judge Manley's Mental Health court; only allowed to get the truth out to a replacement commissioner who actually allowed Plaintiff John to speak about violent abuse by Defendant Davy; fa) This good spirited commissioner was the temporary replacement responsible for letting Plaintiff John know he had the option to recuse himself for a Superior Court judge; therefore Plaintiff John is respectfully asking the court to expediently remand this particular case for proper procedural process.
The effect of defendants' fraudulent scheme and wrongful conduct continues to this day; as defendants are continuing their unlawful and tortious conduct; and, unless restrained by this Court, defendants are likely to continue these unlawful activities into the future...
=========
UPDATE 9 May 2024: Defendant Davy irresponsibly squandered Plaintiff John’s father Lester’s pension monies (Financial Elder Abuse) by pressuring Lester to needlessly remodel Lester’s house leaving Lester broke and desperate and now totally reliant on Defendant Davy. Lester recently allegedly told an anonymous neighbor he made a “deal with the devil” when he gave Defendant Davy power of attorney (POA) since Defendant Davy now is not only attempting to force Lester to sell his property against his will and forcefully place Lester into a nursing home Lester does not want to be relocated to;
But Defendant Davy has also committed financial elder abuse by allegedly redirecting Plaintiff John’s inheritance to her son and daughter; as well as abusing Plaintiff John in a variety of sinister ways for at very least a decade as online prior knowledge proves.
Defendant Tabbada is now willing to testify against Defendant Davy regarding criminal activities conducted and ordered by Defendant Davy compromising Plaintiff John’s constituionmally protected personal property, safety, happiness and privacy etc.
The text message thread between Defendants Davy and Tabbada requires expedient discovery processing to determine manner in which Defendant Tabbada was manipulated by Defendant Davy under duress fearing employment termination which is allegedly occurring soon according to an anonymous source.
Plaintiff John contacted the Sunnyvale DPS Non-Emergency line 9 May 2024 at roughly 12:13 PM desperately requesting help for his 97 year old Father Lester who was allegedly in peril due to Defendant Davy’s multifarious abusive endeavors. Responding DPS phone attendant refused to intervene and help Plaintiff John’s fearful and desperate Father Lester Joseph Clefstad further exposing a continued pattern or practice of discriminatory and grossly negligent behavior putting the mental health and/or financial health etc of Plaintiff John and/or his Father Lester at serious risk.
Plaintiff John contacted the same DPS hotline the day before as seen in screenshot only to be told the opposite by a kind female attendant ~ that Plaintiff John could in fact request a wellness check for his Father Lester. UNLESS CONSTRAINED BY THE COURTS DEFENDANT DAVY WILL CONTINUE HER ABUSIVE CRIMINAL BEHAVIORS AND RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.
STATEMENT FROM PLAINTIFF JOHN: "Defendant Kris Davy attacked Plaintiff John on a Sunday night back in April 2022; causing Plaintiff John to call the Sunnyvale DPS non-emergency line. A female DPS employee answered John's frantic call in the filing room as the DPS desk officer was gone at the time. This unnamed Sunnyvale DPS employee was concerned for Plaintiff John's safety; asking for a wellness check of Defendant Davy who had a black eye from falling over a cement block and breaking her glasses the day before. Defendant Davy can be heard on this recorded phone call (after initially fleeing the scene in fear of DPS) blaming Plaintiff John for Defendant Davy's self-inflicted injurious state...” (SEE ALSO: ATTACHMENT A BELOW)
ONLINE CASE-RELATED SUPPLEMENTAL VISIONAL INFORMATION -- PLAINTIFF JOHN IS SOLE ONLINE ADMINISTRATOR OF ALL INCLUDED ONLINE BLOG-RELATED INFORMATION:
Plaintiff John respectfully asks the court to update their procedural standards and boldy thrust themselves into the future by accepting this current online case-related information and/or prior knowledge information going back several years -- which is available to the general court of public opinion for review in a noble attempt at transparency and attainment of truth and justice;
Also due to the troubling situation regarding the Superior Court of California Family Court Division of Santa Clara County under now disgraced James Towery; found to be discriminating against pro se defendants and/or litigants such as Plaintiff John who had his protected speech rights violated numerous times -- with protections originating from self-executing First Amendment constitutional guarantees:
GO TO: THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: EX-JUDGE JAMES TOWERY & KAREN SINUNU: ASSOCIATED CORRUPTION AFFILIATES @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2023/06/ex-judge-james-towery-karen-sinunu.html
Plaintiff John is requesting to self-represent himself until a lawyer or attorney is retained to push this case through and finally gain just compensation for roughly 20+ years of police misconduct and misfeasance/malfeasance etc officially overseen by the County of Santa Clara:
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: 3 MAY 2022 / INCIDENT #22-123-133 / UNSPEEDY INJUSTICE AND/OR LACK OF CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED SPEEDY JUSTICE; INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; PATTERN AND/OR PRACTICE; RETALIATION; ILLEGAL ENTERPRISE; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; FIRST AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS; FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT VIOLATIONS AND/OR LACK OF DUE PROCESS; CONTINUED POLICE MISCONDUCT; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER AND/OR SLANDER AND/OR DENIGRATION AND/OR LIBEL; ESCALATION; LACK OF LEGALLY REQUIRED RELEVANT EVIDENCE; MISDEMEANOR ASSAULT; ETC ETC ETC @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2022/05/2-may-2022-incident-22-123-133-pattern.html
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA (DTS) CASE # B2201070 + FAMILY COURT DIVISION CASE # 22EA000051 -- PERJURY; ASSAULT; ANIMAL CRUELTY; INVASION OF PRIVACY; OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; DEFAMATION AND/OR SLANDER + ESTABLISHING FACTUAL INNOCENCE ETC: @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2023/06/superior-court-of-california-dts-case_25.html
1) ANIMAL CRUELTY AND OR NEGLECT; 2) INVASION OF PRIVACY; 3) PERJURY; 4) INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND OR I I E D; 5) CLASS-BASED DISCRIMINATION; 6) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; 7) PROPERTY THEFT; 8) ELDER ABUSE; X) BLACKMAIL; 9) DISSUADING A WITNESS + POLICE MISCONDUCT; UNSPEEDY INJUSTICE; ELDER ISOLATION; ATTEMPTED PURPOSEFUL COVID-19 TRANSMISSION; BRUCE MAXWELL AND CWC INVESTIGATION COVER-UP; DRUG PUSHING ETC @ THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: October 2022 @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2022/10/1-animal-cruelty-and-or-neglect-2.html
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: CALIFORNIA STATE BAR PUTS PUBLIC AT RISK:
https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2023/06/california-state-bar-puts-public-at-risk.html
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: EMAIL FROM CARY CRITTENDEN: https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2023/06/email-from-cary-crittenden.html
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: INVASION OF PRIVACY: https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2023/06/invasion-of-privacy.html
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: ESTABLISHING FACTUAL INNOCENCE: https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2023/05/establishing-factual-innocence.html
+ SEE ALSO: STRIKE THREE YOU’RE OUT @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2017/10/strike-three-youre-out.html
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: VARIOUS FRAUDULENT CLAIMS (ETC) https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2017/11/various-fraudulent-claims-etc.html
(SEE ALSO PRIOR KNIOWLEDGE ATTACHMENT X BELOW)
CLASS-BASED DISCRIMINATION IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY:
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/12/class-based-discrimination-etc-in-sc.html
Note: Aforementioned links are not beyond limitations statutes considerating backdated pattern or practice applications; documented past timeline incidental/incident exposure is necessary to prove beyond a reasonable doubt axiomatic existential patterns and/or practices of patently grossly negligent and discriminatory tortious conduct on the part of Defendant Santa Clara County:
Class-based discrimination violates landmark 1964 Civil Rights protections underpinned by class-based discrimination prohibitions disallowing socioeconomic bias. New case law is needed to address these illegal bias discrpancies to overcome financial socioeconomic discriminations due to the current nightrmarish monocultural situations severely disaffecting countless low income individuals.
(Exponential preponderance of axiomatic predominant ignored exculpatory evidentiary content going back as far as 2017 strongly suggests way beyond a reasonable doubt Plaintiff John is not only innocent of all suggested charges; but also a victim of years of unrestrained abuse and neglect on the part of Defendants)
SEE ALSO: THE REVOLVING DOOR OF VIOLENT STALKING AND HARASSMENT @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-revolving-door-of-violent-stalking.html
THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: NEGLIGENCE; DISCRIMINATION; CIVIL INJURY; DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER; SLANDER; INTIMIDATING A WITNESS; GROSS NEGLIGENCE; POLICE MISCONDUCT; TAKING THE FIFTH; INTIMIDATION; COERCION; VIOLENCE; VANDALISM; FALSE ARREST; KIDNAPPING; DEMAND FOR CASE REMAND; VARIOUS FRAUDULENT CLAIMS; CAUSES OF ACTION (INACTION); ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT; SURVEILLANCE ABUSE; POLICE-SPONSORED GANG STALKING; HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS; MULTIFARIOUS MALFEASANCE; TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242; THE SMOKING GUN; LIBERTY INJUSTICE FOR ALL; SEMI-SOCIOPATHIC SOCIAL WORKER; INVESTIGATION OBSTRUCTED AND/OR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE; THE FBI; CONSPIRACY; HATE CRIMES; DOMESTIC TERRORISM; CYBER HARASSMENT; WITNESS INTIMIDATION (ETC) @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2019/02/negligence-discrimination-civil-injury.html
This exhibit exposes the sheer volume of individuals this information was shared with; yet no action or response was ever received from any of the listed recipient/defendants; making internet access somewhat useless and overrated. This arrest of Lee Bagley not only occurred after Lee had received just $150,000 compensation for police dog injuries; but Lee has also allegedly been wrongfuly arrested 10 TIMES since using qualified immunties to retaliate against Lee.
GO TO: A THOROUGH DISCOVERY PROCESS CONDUCTED BY AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN LAWYER PROVED THAT LOW INCOME WHITE MALES ARE INORDINATELY DISCRIMINATED AGAINST BY LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE SF BAY AREA REGION @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/06/a-thorough-discovery-process-conducted.html
*This legally required relevant evidence for defense purpose usages in California by applicable defendants was illegally classified for liability reasons and/or race narrative control.
=========
3 investigations Plaintiff John initiated have been suspended by the City of Sunnyvale; 1) Once after a sustained police-sponsored harassment stalking menacing vandalism campaign by default police-sponsored “RPF”; night time disturbances continued for roughly 7 years at Plaintiff John’s Father Lester’s residence; amounting to elder abuse of both Plaintiff John and his Father Lester. Plaintiff John was swayed as a defendant by a court-appointed POS SCC PDO who refused to allow Plaintiff John’s testimony once again due to the usual gendered bias which allowed Mrs. Rebholtz to commit perjury on a codified submitted court document ultimately defaming Plaintiff John.
go to: https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-revolving-door-of-violent-stalking.html
GO TO: https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/01/january-2015-investigation-obstructed.html + THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: THE HONORABLE SOCRATES MANOUKIAN @
https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-honorable-socrates-manoukian.html
+ SEE ALSO: THE ADDENDUM BLOG: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS AND/OR ILLEGALLY SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE BY THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2010 AND/OR THE SUNNYVALE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN JUNE 2011 (addendumblog1.blogspot.com) @ https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/prior-knowledge-of-events-andor.html
 |
| THIS FLYER SHOWING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS WAS ON FILE AT THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR ROUGHLY ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THE JUNE 2011 INCIDENT |
SEE ALSO: STRIKE THREE YOU’RE OUT @
https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2017/10/strike-three-youre-out.html
+ THE ADDENDUM BLOG: 18 U.S. CODE § 1512 - TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS, VICTIM, OR AN INFORMANT ETC (addendumblog1.blogspot.com) @ https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/09/18-us-code-1512-tampering-with-witness.html + JIM CARRELL/US DOJ EMAIL THREAD: https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2014/05/officer-jim-carrells-prior-knowledge.html
Aforementioned Jim Carrell/US DOJ email thread proves beyond a reasonable doubt the City of Sunnyvale and/or Sunnyvale DPS and/or the United States Department of Injustice had prior knowledge of Plaintiff John’s precarious situation; yet ultimately took zero corrective actions to address this situation.
+ SEE ALSO: THE ADDENDUM BLOG: INCIDENT ON 15 DECEMBER 2013 --
EV 133490020 @ UPDATE / 30 Mar 2016 / EV#16-056-138 > Roughly 2 months after Missy was put to sleep; NRO Officers Fuji and Gantt finally came to Johns' residence to respond; after John had tried unsuccessfully numerous times to get an incident number from Officer Fuji via email (something John has done before > http://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/12/incident-on-15-december-2013.html). Adding insult to injury; the first thing Officer Fuji addressed was cat food dishes on the ground with water in them to keep ants out (part of the reason John wanted the incident number online; because Sunnyvale DPS has a way of always turning on John when their help is most needed). Luckily; Officer Gantt agreed with John and said it was a good idea to do so. A beloved animal was dead; but Officer Fuji wanted to instead talk about cat dishes.
John then went to the side yard where the incident occurred to explain the details of the incident; but Officer Fuji once again attempted to make excuses for the perpetrator of the crime by suggesting it was an accident; even though the person who committed the crime can be clearly seen on surveillance video. And the Veterinarian who helped Missy never saw the surveillance video either; suggested it was an accident as well. The video reveals it was NOT an accident; as Missy never entered the street -- nor did she ever at this point in her life. Missy was 16 years old and stayed on her own property; rarely crossing the street as she regularly did when she was younger.
GO TO: https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/03/birdland-free-press-httpthefreepress1bl.html
QUESTIONS: HAS OFFICER FUJI EVER OWNED A CAT OR DOG? AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA PEOPLE WHO WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REALIZE MANY PEOPLE OFTEN CARE MORE ABOUT THEIR PETS THAN THEIR ELECTED LEADERS...
+ THREE DEAD CATS IN THREE WEEKS IS NO COINCIDENCE; WHO DID THIS?: GO TO: Friday, September 4, 2020 / BABY CAT: MISSING SINCE 2 SEPTEMBER 2020 @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/09/baby-cat-missing-since-2-september-2020.html + Thursday, September 17, 2020 / REST IN PEACE MEESHA CAT I LOVE YOU FOREVER @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/09/rest-in-peace-meecha-cat-i-love-you.html + Sunday, September 27, 2020 / REST IN PEACE CALI CAT I LOVE YOU FOREVER @ https://lreblogger.blogspot.com/2020/09/rest-in-peace-cali-cat-i-love-you.html
Plaintiff John received an official promise to investigate this 2015 claim; but never heard back this time either; amounting to fraudulent claims/promises made by Defendant City of Sunnyvale.
NOTE: JOHN WAS PROMISED AN INVESTIGATION BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE'S RISK MANAGEMENT FIRM CARL WILSON COMPANY; BUT CWC EMPLOYEE BRUCE MAXWELL WAS FIRED MID-INVESTIGATION IN 2022 -- THIS IS THE THIRD INVESTIGATION WHERE PROMISES WERE MADE BY THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE TO INVESTIGATE WRONGDOING WHEN NO INVESTIGATION EVER OCCURRED; ESSENTIALLY AMOUNTING TO ANOTHER FRAUDULENT CLAIM ON THE PART OF THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE AND/OR THEIR RISK MANAGEMENT FIRMS -- FORMERLY GEORGE HILLS COMPANY GHC NOW CARL WARREN COMPANY AND/OR CWC (DOCUMENTATION OF THIS INVESTIGATION CLAIM WAS ULTIMATELY STOLEN FROM PLAINTIFF JOHN’S VEHICLE LAST SUMMER)
=========
 |
| 4 JUNE 2020: CARL WARREN COMPANY CORRESPONDENCE TO PLAINTIFF JOHN REGARDING GEORGE HILLS COMPANY DEPARTURE FROM CITY OF SUNNYVALE: WHY DID GEORGE HILLS COMPANY DEPART RISK MANAGEMENT DUTIES FOR THE CITY OF SUNNYVALE IN JUNE OF 2020? WHY DID THIS SUDDEN UNEXPLAINED DEPARTURE OCCUR AND WHO ELSE HAS BEEN ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY GEORGE HILLS COMPANY? |
Due to policies allowing unrestrained criminal activity; not only has Defendant Davy been allowed to misallocate Plaintiff John’s constitutionally protected private property; but also vehicle thieves who similarly victimized Plaintiff John.
WITNESSES:
JOHN ANDREW CLEFSTAD
BOBBY MARTINEZ
SANDY TABBADA
+ more witnesses TBA...
=========
CASE-RELATED ATTACHMENTS:
ATTACHMENT A:
ATTACHMENT A: PLAINTIFF JOHN’S VOTING RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED WHEN JUDGE MANLEY’S MENTAL HEALTH COURT SCRUTINIZED PLAINTIFF JOHN’S LEGAL CONSUMPTION OF CANNABIS SINCE USING THE COLOR OF LAW CANNOT BE UTILIZED TO INTIMIDATE AND/OR COERCE VOTERS BEFORE AND/OR 20+ YEARS AFTER VOTING > SEE ALSO: THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: GENERAL ELECTION DAY / 8 NOVEMBER 2016 @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/11/election-day-8-november-2016.html
THIS FLYER SHOWING PRIOR KNOWLEDGE OF EVENTS WAS ON FILE AT THE SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR ROUGHLY ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THE JUNE 2011 INCIDE
ATTACHMENT B:
ATTACHMENT C:
.jpg)
Plaintiff John legally consumed cannabis as a Proposition 215 patient and remains protected by State of California cannabis directives providing continued legal protections for all Proposition 215 legal medical cannabis patients.
Plaintiff John seeks unspecified monetary damages for the illegal confiscation of his legally grown cannabis 18 May 2022 by Santa Clara County Sheriffs. Plaintiff John has rarely voted since having his voting rights egregiously violated years ago.
SEE ALSO: THE ADDENDUM BLOG 2: UNITED STATES PATENT / CANNABINOIDS AS ANTIOXIDANTS AND NEUROPROTECTANTS + 18 U.S. CODE - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS ETC @ https://addendumblog2.blogspot.com/2016/07/united-states-patent-cannabinoids-as.html
ATTACHMENT X:
.jpg)
Not only did Mrs. Rebholtz make false statements; but her entire dialogue disintegrated as Jake Paolinetti later confessed to the years long stalking harassment menacing campaign in December of 2011; roughly six months after the Rebholtz party incident -- and Sunnyvale DPS either refused and/or was too lame to put two and two together and unravel the lies.
GO TO: THE ADDENDUM BLOG: REST IN PEACE, PRECIOUS... (addendumblog1.blogspot.com) https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2013/11/rest-in-peace-precious.html
At the conslusion of this roughly 7 years campaign of domestic terrorism; Plaintiff John was left financially, economically physically and emotionally devastated after this years long egregious non-coincidental campaign of terror and disruption.
SEE ALSO: THE ADDENDUM BLOG: THE SUNNYVALE FIRE DEPARTMENT? (addendumblog1.blogspot.com) @ https://addendumblog1.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-sunnyvale-fire-department.html
Plaintiff John respectfully asks the court to consider remanding this case for review by a required Superior Court judge. Also; due to time constraints additional visional evidentiary information will be submitted at a later date...
updated: 30 July 2024
No comments:
Post a Comment